|
Re: Interpreting the EULA.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Veedeejem!
Then why on earth do people feel the need to mention them at all?
If there's no proof or anything close to relating Denial to this topic then they should not be mentioned at all...
BTW: If people really believe that Denial had a system in place last round where you could just access all members account etc etc, then why the **** did they try to wake me up all those times in the middle of the night?
|
Are you being intentionally dense?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zebra
Sun_Tzu started the thread as a discussion of 'Interpretting the EULA' and has been using Denial's bot as a real world example. Mz explicitly said a Denial botnet was possible but he had zero proof whatsoever and his point was purely theoretical (in bold too, but communication skills don't seem to be the strong point in past and present Denial members). Phil^ was mostly talking about tech stuff or the specifics of the closures (from when 3 Denial HC cheated, if you'll recall). Going for false sympathy ftl.
|
Of course, this was before it got hijacked by what seems to be nothing more than a communication error between Denial HC and the community at large, here kindly represented by Phil.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|