[zebra]

Originally Posted by Veedeejem!

Sure, it may all be theoretical and they may just simply be uses as a real life example...
However there was absolutly no need to drag Denial into this. They could have simply said "alliance x" or not mention them at all.
To me, being an outside spectator, they just mention Denial just to put even more people on the anti-denial bandwagon making a post that has **** all to do with denial but accidently "mentioning" them even though they have no proof at all that Denial has a system like that in place or has used a system like that in the past.
If they would have had even the slightest bit of proof that Denial did use something like that I wouldn't mind but as it stands now they're just using the Denial name to fit into their (and probably yours too) propaganda

False cheating accusations FTL! (caus that's what this basicly is, even if it's only meant to be "theoretical" and a "real life example")

Except it's been stated there's no proof. No one has accused Denial of cheating (with regards to the topic of this thread). The Denial HC's are far better at anti-Denial propaganda than Sun_Tzu or anyone else could hope to be. Stop being overly defensive (which often has a positive correlation to guilt) and tell us your personal interpretation of the highlighted parts of the EULA.