Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tomkat
It can be fun when blocks fight, as long as the blocks break off when the winner of the superblocks is clear.
NARWEET vs VVOMM (i think?) was good - that was fun as it then became NAR vs WEET, and then WE vs ET. If the defeated alliances had got their acts together with the other alliances who broke off from the block, a new war could have been fought (with less planets on one side, but bigger, vs the smaller planets but in huge numbers).
|
Breaks off? Good? Are you quite well preserved, Tomkat? Yes, r5 was hilarious. After all "Ely/WPO/Ni!" *broke off* (read: were kicked) when the round was about to stagnate (read: was already stagnant, and Legion/Fury so far ahead there was no chance they'd lose the war).
r7 was hilariously exciting with blocks. 'lo same story, FLTTVMOHIASKRKS+++.
r9 was really good with blocks. 'lo same story, NARWEET.
Face up to facts, Tomkat. Superblocks kick out new roidtargets when the round is stagnant and the opposition so firmly beaten that there is no chance the alliances doing the kicking might get caught by those kicked. I challenge you to name a singular example of the opposite happening.