View Single Post
Unread 22 Jun 2016, 16:15   #179
BloodyButcher
Propaganda Chief
 
BloodyButcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
BloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud ofBloodyButcher has much to be proud of
Re: r67 who will win

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk View Post
It's just sad that the planets in his galaxy are spending most of their resources on defense ships, so he can hold onto roids. Without that defense his tactic would fail, so he should be closed for abuse.

It's just sad that the scanners in his alliance are scanning using mostly alliance taxes. Without those resources they wouldn't be able to scan, so they should be closed for abuse.

It's just sad that the planets he attacks with recall at eta 1, so he can get the full cap. Without those escorts his tactic would fail, so he should be closed for abuse.

It's just sad that he uses his connections to arrange pnaps, so he doesn't get much incs. Without those pnaps his tactic would fail, so he should be closed for abuse.
Now for me it might sound like your a friend of benneh, or the ones in that gal so you would naturaly defend their crimes, much like you said dav the cheater was most likely wrongly closed when he got caught cheating the last time.


I think patrikc said it earlier in this thread, initiating roids to give away for free has been a crime in the past, why they havnt been closed for doing this yet this round Appocomaster or the MHs will prolly come answer for sooner or later.

Maybe you will now point to the rules and saying as long as there is no proof of a agreement between the attacker and the defender, no cheating has ever occured, and perhaps you are correct in this statement.

BUT you have played PA/PIA/browser games long enough to know this is a good premise to close/not close planets on, as you will in 99,99% of the farming incidents never be able to prove that there was a preset agreement of the attacker/farmer/crasher/defender/what ever and the attacker/farmer/crasher/defender/what ever.

Repeatively initiating roids and being attacked by the same planet/allie without defending
OR repeatively keep crashing your fleet at the same planet/allie
OR repeatively setting yourself up to be cov-opped
OR any repeatively action that will give benefits to another planet has been, and will always be punished.

If we are gonna start going soft on the rules, or the way we enforce them, we might aswell allow all kind of cheating, wich afaik, is what PA crew now is considering.
__________________
RainbowS

RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
BloodyButcher is offline   Reply With Quote