User Name
Password

Go Back   Planetarion Forums > Search Forums
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Today's Posts

Showing results 1 to 36 of 36
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: loophole
Forum: Strategic Discussions 10 Oct 2015, 13:35
Replies: 275
Views: 52,535
Posted By loophole
Re: Santa Stats

Well, I started to feel an ounce of respect for Tia from that post until the end when she dissed you just for funsies.
Forum: Strategic Discussions 10 Oct 2015, 13:29
Replies: 275
Views: 52,535
Posted By loophole
Re: Santa Stats

Or top 1000 would be a good indication of race spread
Forum: Strategic Discussions 10 Oct 2015, 13:28
Replies: 275
Views: 52,535
Posted By loophole
Re: Santa Stats

Got a link to original set before "tweaks"
Forum: Strategic Discussions 10 Oct 2015, 13:25
Replies: 275
Views: 52,535
Posted By loophole
Re: Santa Stats

This set had the greatest race equality? What changes did they make? Xan got inits lowered and damage increased? Then etd had a similar effect?

I don't give a shit what new thing is being added....
Forum: Strategic Discussions 10 Oct 2015, 05:16
Replies: 275
Views: 52,535
Posted By loophole
Re: Santa Stats

W

T

F

Why?

I'm seriously disappointed. Appocco? What's wrong with Santa's set? Xan weren't good enough? I don't get it.
Forum: Strategic Discussions 5 Oct 2015, 04:15
Replies: 275
Views: 52,535
Posted By loophole
Re: Santa Stats

I've not looked in great detail, but I'm starting now. As most have said......interesting set. I'll go one further and say this is by far the most balanced set I've seen in years. It's going to be...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 25 May 2015, 03:55
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

So still not final? BB are you going cath now? True test of whether Stas are balanced is if you can play cath :) so I must know.....what will you play?
Forum: Strategic Discussions 23 May 2015, 05:28
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

Any changes planned or are these stats final now?
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 21:21
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

Two maybe, I think. We chose the harder path for sure.
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 20:04
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

yes, and xan/ter/zik were under represented compared to racial ratio of the universe. ETD had fighters AND De.

Being on the receiving end of De incoming I can say 5 etd coming wouldn't worry me...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 19:35
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

And what were the top 100 distributions for ter, xan, zik, and etd?
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 19:29
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

you have to account for the 5% scanners/covoppers that went cath also. Not to mention the bots, supports, and ship farms.

Adjust for that and cath have a disproportionate representation in the top...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 19:24
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

I mean, it sounds to me like you would like for a Cath to be able to solo any race double their their own value and need monster team ups to get through a cath defense.

I think what you are...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 19:05
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

I can agree there is no NEED to nerf scarab if you buff emp resistance accross 5 ships, but why? When you can just change the one ship. buffing those em resistances would have made cath more...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 18:59
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

because beetle can defend against broker and hits first. So it needs to be slightly lower eff for balance.

There's no reason to doggedly make cath emp higher eff. Or terran armor always higher....
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 18:55
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

I can agree, last round had some great stats, but scarab were the worst part of it. IMO a slightly nerfed scarab would have made the set better.
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 18:46
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

Beetle does out init broker. with a fairly good eff(for these stats). So did you have a deeper concern? I mean besides one ETD ship having higher eff than cath, while being prefired BY a cath ship? ...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 18:02
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

Regardless, I think government has so little to do with stats, that everything posted today has been a waste of time on the topic at hand:STATS.

I'd like to apologize for my part in this.

Now...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 17:45
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

And there it is. Londo is wrong. No concession given on a point well made. Just wrong.

Butcher says it's more costly for high ranks to anarchy than low ranks. Discussion over!

Yes, it costs...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 17:24
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

BB is more concerned with being right than being correct. So I'm afraid while you are correct Londo, you will inevitably be wrong; As far as BB is concerned.

But good try. I commend you on using...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 17:15
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

My comments were on anarchy. When did I say anything about cath emp eff?

Those % in my post were about potency, not cath eff.
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 16:15
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

less potent maybe. But a drop of water in a bottle of liquor makes it less potent. Technicalities.

Cath also has the option to go demo for the first 200 ticks and switch to corp or tot whatever....
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 May 2015, 13:37
Replies: 228
Views: 55,859
Posted By loophole
Re: Blue's Stat Set Rnd 62

[QUOTE=BloodyButcher;3242961]You seriously dont play a lot of cath then.
I dont think you even know how they are working, and what changes the new goverment did to the strengths of the race.
If i...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 18 May 2015, 05:58
Replies: 131
Views: 24,271
Posted By loophole
Re: booji stats proposals

De was also my biggest worry on these stats. Cath de targets too much imo. I see why you want it like that, but without 2 tick defence it's too much. There are no fighters targeting de. There are no...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 16 May 2015, 12:17
Replies: 131
Views: 24,271
Posted By loophole
Re: booji stats proposals

Almost and maybe this or maybe that? You distinctly said there were 3 sets earlier being proposed in addition to the 2 we've seen already. Do you ever consider what you type?

I just what to see...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 16 May 2015, 04:21
Replies: 131
Views: 24,271
Posted By loophole
Re: booji stats proposals

Sad. I, myself liked a lot about this set. Sure there were some things I thought would cause problems, but you'll never please everyone and there will never be a perfect Stat set. Period. The main...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 8 May 2015, 14:42
Replies: 266
Views: 28,733
Posted By loophole
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 25 Feb 2015, 05:20
Replies: 2
Views: 3,180
Posted By loophole
galaxy banners

I'm curious why galaxy banners aren't like they used to be. I've been away a few years, and now I don't see top galaxies making banners with member names.

I don't see alliance logos on banners....
Forum: Alliance Recruitment 11 Feb 2015, 22:07
Replies: 23
Views: 5,634
Posted By loophole
Re: Pacifism

does booji leak? I think so :D
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 16 Jan 2015, 15:18
Replies: 260
Views: 30,745
Posted By loophole
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 6 Nov 2014, 20:10
Replies: 2
Views: 4,131
Posted By loophole
Re: research transferral

Thanks, appocomaster pm me already.

guess you have to have it researched to see what the actual operation is called.
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 6 Nov 2014, 15:57
Replies: 2
Views: 4,131
Posted By loophole
research transferral

what's the formula for research transferral cov op?

i can't find it in the manual under covops or formulae

thanks
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 6 Nov 2014, 15:55
Replies: 337
Views: 52,709
Posted By loophole
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 28 Aug 2014, 17:55
Replies: 303
Views: 46,058
Posted By loophole
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 28 Aug 2014, 16:54
Replies: 1
Views: 4,086
Posted By loophole
Old member having a look around

Hi guys. I'm glad to see PA is still here. I was just curious about something I read on my stroll through PA memory lane.

In round 57 someone got 3rd by using "MCs" and escorts.

What are MCs? ...
Forum: Alliance Recruitment 5 Aug 2011, 00:50
Replies: 48
Views: 17,027
Posted By loophole
Re: Apprime looking for new idiots

You just looking for new idiots? Or would shitty old ones do the job as well?
Showing results 1 to 36 of 36

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018