User Name
Password

Go Back   Planetarion Forums > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 164 of 164
Search took 0.04 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: Sandvold
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 7 Nov 2017, 21:31
Replies: 24
Views: 543
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Undo the roid cost change!

Make the formula exponential. Easily solved
Forum: Alliance Discussions 23 Oct 2017, 15:36
Replies: 45
Views: 1,927
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Round 74 wine thread

Totally agree, looks like a lazy move to limits ult's prelaunch ability.

Another move to make it more even for the less active, but an idiotic move for the game
Forum: Alliance Discussions 20 Sep 2017, 23:40
Replies: 132
Views: 6,196
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R73 whine thread.

Ult played good, didnt give up.

They found a strat move we hadn't anticipated, with faking att with lancers. This burnt out our DC's as we didn't really have a way to counter it.

And as we...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 4 Sep 2017, 21:35
Replies: 104
Views: 3,343
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Round 74 shipstat suggestions

At least we're back to a 4 race set. Zik is just totally useless, 0 point with the race
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 3 Sep 2017, 19:46
Replies: 7
Views: 467
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Restrict defence to galaxy/alliance

All planets counting + only ally and gal can def would be awsome
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 14 Aug 2017, 07:37
Replies: 6
Views: 602
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Exception Rules

I've never had an exception and probably never will as my gf hate that i play this game. But i totally agree that the current exception system need a rework
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 5 Aug 2017, 19:59
Replies: 40
Views: 1,743
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Quest Refresh

Great addition.

If possible maybe switch it a bit around reward wise so we can't do it on auto-pilot for future rounds.

But was fun actually having to plan something new again!
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 5 Aug 2017, 19:28
Replies: 18
Views: 618
Posted By Sandvold
Re: game within the game

So total gained value the round, but the ships not counting itself?

Sounds like something to build from.
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 3 Aug 2017, 23:41
Replies: 18
Views: 618
Posted By Sandvold
Re: game within the game

The forumla change have been done wrong twice in my opinion.

1500 + 125*existing roids + 1.04^existing roids

This would be so much better, and i'm not very good in math and spent the whole 5...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 3 Aug 2017, 10:29
Replies: 132
Views: 6,196
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R73 whine thread.

Unfortunately I agree. Was busy all summer so didn't have time to come with any input, so can't really complain. But this looks like one of the most boring stats sets in a long long time
Forum: Alliance Discussions 2 Aug 2017, 16:22
Replies: 42
Views: 1,789
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities

100% agree, i don't see a reason why not all should be counting, or lets say 55 so not one or two guys can leave the alliance to ruin a potential win.

There is no reason why you can't get a top...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 16 Jul 2017, 10:54
Replies: 126
Views: 3,511
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Kai's Rd 73 Stats

I'm pretty sure the combat engine do ETD ships first then zik, xan, cath and ter. Which was the reason for stay change this round. Vindi and Cutlass had same init. Combat engine knew both vindi and...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 30 Jun 2017, 23:42
Replies: 23
Views: 826
Posted By Sandvold
Re: FAnG gives 24h notice

Oh buddah you know exactly what he means :)
Forum: Alliance Discussions 27 Jun 2017, 15:14
Replies: 290
Views: 11,697
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R72 discussion thread

it's pretty much p3n/ult/bf that sorts the crashing we just def:)
Forum: Alliance Discussions 11 Jun 2017, 19:37
Replies: 290
Views: 11,697
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R72 discussion thread

Stop using logic, if everyone did that AD would be boring
Forum: Alliance Discussions 10 Jun 2017, 09:06
Replies: 290
Views: 11,697
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R72 discussion thread

Paisley made the stats right?

He had nothing to do and wasn't asked about the strat App decided on.
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 4 Jun 2017, 16:55
Replies: 10
Views: 452
Posted By Sandvold
Re: help for a new player

Bows is always saying they are a training alliance, so I would check with them.

Talk to butcher
Forum: Alliance Discussions 25 Apr 2017, 23:29
Replies: 427
Views: 15,726
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R71 Prediction, drama, and fun thread.

This one should be easy to understand butcher, now you are just playing stupid.

Guppie = Ult member
Xerxes = Ult member

Usually when you ask for escorts you ask from your own ally, if Xerxes...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 22 Apr 2017, 12:20
Replies: 427
Views: 15,726
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R71 Prediction, drama, and fun thread.

How on earth is not that not an NAP?
Forum: Alliance Discussions 21 Apr 2017, 10:13
Replies: 427
Views: 15,726
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R71 Prediction, drama, and fun thread.

Pretty sure most of my roids are p3n roids:)

And ye i know what you say about the attack, and I even buy it. In our opinion p3n do as they always do. Act and expect no concevences, and also play...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 20 Apr 2017, 19:44
Replies: 427
Views: 15,726
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R71 Prediction, drama, and fun thread.

P3n is ofc free to ptarget whoever they want, but can't expect to get help and goodwill in return. Not hard to understand.

And before booji and/or munkee respond that it was gal raiding not...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 17 Apr 2017, 14:04
Replies: 98
Views: 5,239
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R72 shipstats

Please no same init emp again
Forum: Alliance Discussions 4 Apr 2017, 21:45
Replies: 427
Views: 15,726
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R71 Prediction, drama, and fun thread.

Pablitem have already said he'll pay for the wall. He's actually started building it already
Forum: Alliance Discussions 25 Mar 2017, 22:21
Replies: 427
Views: 15,726
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R71 Prediction, drama, and fun thread.

So who exactly napped ult now?
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Mar 2017, 20:23
Replies: 427
Views: 15,726
Posted By Sandvold
Forum: Alliance Discussions 6 Mar 2017, 16:40
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

Agree that all these things should be red flagged
Forum: Alliance Discussions 5 Mar 2017, 23:12
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

So the cov op target which you accepted into alliance after being farmed by your members isn't a much worse violation then me not bothering about someone running a script that opens a link?
Forum: Alliance Discussions 5 Mar 2017, 22:36
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

That's something totally different that influence writes. Influence talk about an acutal bot that can sign in from a commmand. Bascially there is no way of controlling if mIRC opens a link...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 5 Mar 2017, 18:59
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

#scans on irc works exactly the same way as a scanbot. So ye if you used #scans then you are as much of a cheater as everyone that's used one in an alliance. If the person is online and logged in the...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 28 Feb 2017, 17:06
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

They knew about the pnaps also?

I don't even have TA and never requested to be called on WA. You called me once during round a morning to get def.

Also you should know by now that paid planets...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 28 Feb 2017, 16:30
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

Still doesn't change the fact that he responds to questions CBA asks :)

I wrote what Seven told me, that he didn't try to get anyone to hit us.
If I belive it is another case.

Response to...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 28 Feb 2017, 15:11
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

Maybe quote right post you nub:) CBA posted that question
Forum: Alliance Discussions 27 Feb 2017, 23:12
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

Since Seven haven't responded.

Seven was HC himself at the time in question.

According to himself this didn't happen, not app members or other in the gal
Forum: Alliance Discussions 27 Feb 2017, 18:56
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

[QUOTE=sevenseas;3255531]

Most of regular app member that was around that they know as MQ and Cardi talked about it in public chan

And yes i can confirm that MQ deffed
Forum: Strategic Discussions 26 Feb 2017, 22:07
Replies: 92
Views: 8,898
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R71 shipstats

Only thing I'm sceptical about is fr/de is impossible to play without teamups, might be an interesting twist. Haven't had time to run any calcs, so might work out well
Forum: Alliance Discussions 26 Feb 2017, 15:40
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

You missed the point of my post. I remembered it as we had a good lead, and I didn't remember anything from the thread you posted.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 26 Feb 2017, 02:55
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

Interesting read don't remember any of it :) but seems Storebo was kicked for setting raid on non 1ups like seven did this round. Got Storebo looking through logs and would be interesting to see what...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 25 Feb 2017, 15:03
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

I was GC in that round, r17 or something. Elviz was actually not in charge of the gal as I accepted Elviz into my BP that won r15.

I don't remember the xelnaga story, but I can't really say it...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Feb 2017, 00:20
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

Thanks for proving that I didn't edit the post :) :up:
Forum: Alliance Discussions 12 Feb 2017, 23:03
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

Learn to read. When stats come out, which is much easier then going on with who did what. Then we can discuss based on numbers not on what we remember.

I don't remember the tick but the day p3n...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 12 Feb 2017, 22:26
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

We can do when the stats are out, i don't really have a list of raids :)
Forum: Alliance Discussions 12 Feb 2017, 21:29
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

So many factual errors.

First it wasn't the galraid on 6.1 that was ptarget. You started ptargeting us when you napped norse after hitting them for a few days.

By p3n logic that was probably...
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 10 Feb 2017, 23:16
Replies: 96
Views: 8,116
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Round stagnation

Totally agree with the suggestion. Best one so far.
Forum: Strategic Discussions 7 Feb 2017, 07:17
Replies: 92
Views: 8,898
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R71 shipstats

I like this set quite alot. Lots of faking options. Good work :up:
Forum: Alliance Discussions 6 Feb 2017, 17:36
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

Sorry to post log, but it's not that secret:

Jan 22:
booji [10:17 AM]
munks got fed up of the constant incs

[10:18]
thought we were just going to hit the odd gal of yours but somehow...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 5 Feb 2017, 23:47
Replies: 556
Views: 27,832
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R70 prediction & drama thread

Can confirm, we did the ult deal as we was supposed to troll. Then i don't remember why and how it came to be, but Norse got inc. We still only had around 40 players. Norse asked for a tick 200 deal,...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 3 Dec 2016, 14:58
Replies: 21
Views: 2,636
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R69: inc stats

Probably I would be extremly surprised if we managed to launch 150 fleets that day. We launched a pathetic 1300 fleet all round.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 2 Dec 2016, 19:36
Replies: 61
Views: 7,311
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Congrats to ult round 69

Reaction of p3n napping ult and getting them to hit us with them.

P3n couldn't take 1 week of inc, which after we would have rejoined vs ult. It's p3n's choice hitting us that made us nap ult. If...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 2 Dec 2016, 17:11
Replies: 61
Views: 7,311
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Congrats to ult round 69

3422 for app from ingame intel
Forum: Alliance Discussions 29 Nov 2016, 10:13
Replies: 334
Views: 22,994
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Upcomming r69 drama thread!

Which agreement. As far as i know we had none, we've had a friendly relationship most the round, except when u joined the gangbang on us.

Have any NAP been dicussed? Any deals actually made...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 29 Nov 2016, 07:06
Replies: 334
Views: 22,994
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Upcomming r69 drama thread!

Break NAP for no obvious reason? After i've teased you guys for the same thing?

Munkee isn't playing in app :)
Forum: Alliance Discussions 25 Nov 2016, 16:27
Replies: 334
Views: 22,994
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Upcomming r69 drama thread!

I bet that "deal" went both ways. So you didn't lay off them to tick 1000, you laid off them to tick 992 or something. You know what until means?

Wonder who most ppl think is making a fool out of...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 25 Nov 2016, 16:00
Replies: 334
Views: 22,994
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Upcomming r69 drama thread!

NAP = non agression pact right?

Which by definition is to not to be hostile before tick 1000, if you land in tick 1k your hosility started like tick 992. Or isnt launching an attack fleet a...
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 25 Nov 2016, 10:33
Replies: 10
Views: 1,532
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Limits on incoming

That's why it should be value based, not number based
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 25 Nov 2016, 09:36
Replies: 10
Views: 1,532
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2

I've discussed this with a few different guys also, even before the round.

If you were to implement such a change i think you would have to make it so that it's value adjusted, not only number of...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 25 Nov 2016, 08:14
Replies: 334
Views: 22,994
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Upcomming r69 drama thread!

We napped ult the 11th of Nov, p3n napped ult the 14th of Nov.

So ult attack you the 12th, 13th and 14th.

So three days can't be defined as a few?
Forum: Alliance Discussions 22 Nov 2016, 21:46
Replies: 334
Views: 22,994
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Upcomming r69 drama thread!

The first parts we kind of agree in so no point in dicussing. 2nd part that there was no willingness to help on ult later is wrong. Munkee telling we'll hit app no mather what is. We discussed this...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 18 Oct 2016, 22:26
Replies: 265
Views: 11,683
Posted By Sandvold
Forum: Alliance Discussions 11 Oct 2016, 06:33
Replies: 20
Views: 1,573
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R68 covop stats

Yes

I also checked the nick for those two planets that norse cov oped alot. Nothing listed, so not that planet I belived BB was refering to earlier
Forum: Alliance Discussions 24 Sep 2016, 17:06
Replies: 131
Views: 4,317
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Ultores R68 Summary

Munkee thats why i adjusted for members not active members. And ye we 100% deserved all the inc from p3n this round no doubt. And we knew it would come. But we decided to fight instead of idling.
...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 24 Sep 2016, 09:41
Replies: 131
Views: 4,317
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Ultores R68 Summary

DG: No hitting two planets was not the reason why i said backstabbing. Napping bows without letting us know, then extending the deal was.

Also we've taken up this 5 alliances on us bullshit. You...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 24 Sep 2016, 00:25
Replies: 131
Views: 4,317
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Ultores R68 Summary

p3n got hit by norse after throwing us under the bus twice, as stated earlier.

At the same time we had incs from bows+nd so we napped ult.

Later on we made a cf with bows, and took "revenge"...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 23 Sep 2016, 23:40
Replies: 131
Views: 4,317
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Ultores R68 Summary

Norse 191 181 162 130 128 127 119 117 115 110 | 1380
Bows 190 172 166 159 158 149 129 126 107 104 | 1461
p3n 203 172 164 158 151 148 123 121 118 115 | 1473


Adjusted for...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 23 Sep 2016, 23:22
Replies: 86
Views: 4,727
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Next round stats?

I think mzy raised some valid points earlier.

List:
Beetle as ally def, Ghost ingal against Fi. Only kill-based fleet that has actual counters.

Only ingal Rogue counters Fr.

No ally def...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 23 Sep 2016, 23:10
Replies: 131
Views: 4,317
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Ultores R68 Summary

And those mass waves on p3n wasn't that massive when u look on inc stats. Compared to members (available fleets) they didn't get target much harder then norse did on their days with most inc.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 23 Sep 2016, 19:13
Replies: 5
Views: 1,498
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Alliance counting members

Yes!

Don't care if tag limit is 30,40,50 or 60, but make all members count!
Forum: Alliance Discussions 14 Sep 2016, 14:57
Replies: 310
Views: 21,630
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R68, who plays? who wins?

Got some intel wrong here.

Norse never made any "pact" with ult to get 1 and 2. We however napped ult and said we would support em for #1, when we had quite a lot of inc from bows,nd and some...
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 12 Sep 2016, 22:03
Replies: 44
Views: 2,943
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Remove alliance defence fleet

Don't disagree that's easier to keep roids.Still think it's a crap and boring feature :P
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 12 Sep 2016, 19:31
Replies: 44
Views: 2,943
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Remove alliance defence fleet

Actually agree.

I would go one step further. Let launch show the instant you launch it (as it was in the old days). When you prelaunch it gets launched in the start of the tick. So if you...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 11 Sep 2016, 21:30
Replies: 310
Views: 21,630
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R68, who plays? who wins?

I said we fight p3n for totally different reasons then supporting ult. We soley attack you since u threw us under the bus x2. And not being upfront about it. How much inc can be checked later, cba to...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 11 Sep 2016, 09:20
Replies: 310
Views: 21,630
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R68, who plays? who wins?

So much untrue statements in this post.

1. P3n and norse decided to hit bows togehter (not sure who approached who). Then after 1-2 nights p3n decide to nap bows without telling norse. Letting us...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 10 Sep 2016, 17:48
Replies: 310
Views: 21,630
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R68, who plays? who wins?

P3n basically threw us under the bus x2. Also they had their fair share of hitting the smaller alliances. We came to a point were we couldn't be arsed to just idle.

Ye we napped ult and said we...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 10 Sep 2016, 10:09
Replies: 310
Views: 21,630
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R68, who plays? who wins?

We attacked p3n long before Ult joined in, so actually have nothing to do with helping ult.

We started hitting p3n for totally different reasons then support for ult.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 6 Sep 2016, 16:43
Replies: 310
Views: 21,630
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R68, who plays? who wins?

Not often I agree with Kaiba, but this isn't a stupid suggestion*. I am a value player and will probably be so in the future as well, but I really like the idea.

I still would want to remove ally...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 3 Sep 2016, 17:44
Replies: 310
Views: 21,630
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R68, who plays? who wins?

Remove ally fleet. Increase counting members to 60. If you really want it to be 40 counting then make it avg score*40. Ally fleet launch + def planets and u'll never land.

I wouldn't mind at all...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 26 Aug 2016, 22:31
Replies: 310
Views: 21,630
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R68, who plays? who wins?

Hehe when you played last norse had terrible def. Ask p3n, fl, ult or anyone and they all agree that we're not that crap in defence as we were before, when we didn't def at all.

And it really got...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 21 Aug 2016, 22:20
Replies: 296
Views: 10,290
Posted By Sandvold
Forum: Strategic Discussions 15 Jul 2016, 18:43
Replies: 85
Views: 5,843
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R68 Shipstat proposals

Jintao have his matrix and it will always be paper rock scissor as long as he's in charge.

We won't see any fun stats. Except the crazy set he's playing with
Forum: Alliance Discussions 15 Jul 2016, 18:37
Replies: 476
Views: 25,901
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r67 who will win

Actually agree.

Remove prelaunch for attack, prelaunch def +3.

Remove ally fleet.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Jul 2016, 01:16
Replies: 36
Views: 2,163
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Tick 922 BF dropping score on purposes

Some might even say nelito was the reason why BF was hit in the first place :) You can ask the guys running BF about it if u want an explanation
Forum: Alliance Discussions 16 Jun 2016, 23:52
Replies: 476
Views: 25,901
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r67 who will win

It's not a diffent way of play. When you have a way that will beat a regular way of playing every time it's an error. I've done the calculations try it and if u think it's somethiing that should be...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 16 Jun 2016, 21:54
Replies: 476
Views: 25,901
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r67 who will win

Nah if he keeps it up it a sure win. He'll make 15 mill easy. Can't be beaten by value. Trust me thats a low estimate. I've calced it a few rounds ago. A semi active scanner could get 15 mill planet...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 16 Jun 2016, 21:05
Replies: 476
Views: 25,901
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r67 who will win

Yea thats why im not saying anything agaisnt it. We abuse dthe system no doubt. I also ponted out the scanning stuff thats an abuse and the def xp which is also an exploit/abuse whatever. It was just...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 16 Jun 2016, 06:32
Replies: 476
Views: 25,901
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r67 who will win

Ye spot on:)
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Jun 2016, 23:51
Replies: 476
Views: 25,901
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r67 who will win

I know how the scan formula work nox:) I've used it. Learned from looking at agar at kia:P Thing is that u can get around 600xp a day from scanning.

What i want changed is now u can scan same...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Jun 2016, 23:04
Replies: 476
Views: 25,901
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r67 who will win

I think the same tbh and is why I said abuse and not cheating. The def xp wasn't intended that way but is now being used to win. And i have used the def xp + scan xp myself.

As i mentioned to...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Jun 2016, 22:19
Replies: 476
Views: 25,901
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r67 who will win

It's very smart:) around 10 mill more from xp or so (14 if he does it extreme) ? takes like 3-4k roids avg from now with max xp beat him or so. Told several guys before it can't be beaten:)
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Jun 2016, 20:54
Replies: 476
Views: 25,901
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r67 who will win

I didn't play for 40-50 rounds so not familiar with all the history of what have happened or not. But I can't see anything in the rules that says it's illegal.

It's abuse, not saying it's wrong,...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Jun 2016, 19:06
Replies: 476
Views: 25,901
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r67 who will win

That was really boring as well!!! Trust me:P

*However you miss out on 2 mill score, so someone that want to try do the same still got a shot!
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Jun 2016, 18:33
Replies: 476
Views: 25,901
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r67 who will win

Guess he's looking at the def xp win we'll have.

Been talking about that it should be done for rounds already, pretty much impossible to stop:)

Fair play to benneh trying it out. Got to be...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 13 May 2016, 09:18
Replies: 157
Views: 8,432
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R67 Shipstats proposals

Talked to Jintao earlier this week and i can forward what he said.

It's most likely not the set at beta, but it's either the one at speedgame or xmas that will be run. Which of em wasn't decided...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 8 May 2016, 15:21
Replies: 109
Views: 4,075
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r66 Changes

Don't think anyone in norse is really against the ally fleet feature. More like we don't see how it's great for the game. Only thing i dislike about it is that i think it will be more...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 4 May 2016, 07:39
Replies: 38
Views: 3,917
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Zikonia has fallen (r67 stats proposal)

Seems like an interesting set.

Things differ quite a lot when u calc and not just look at init and targeting for a change.

Haven't looked closely enough to say it's a good set, but seems...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 19 Apr 2016, 22:59
Replies: 539
Views: 34,663
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 who will win

Correct so ct lose ground each day( need 40k xp, but only gain aprox 30k)

Ult is gaining a bit (need 50k, gained 55k), but at that time bf had even more roids so both actually lost more vs bf.
...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 19 Apr 2016, 22:44
Replies: 539
Views: 34,663
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 who will win

Doesnt mather if they got stocks. If they gain less then 1k xp pr player a day they'll lose tarrain.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 19 Apr 2016, 22:33
Replies: 539
Views: 34,663
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 who will win

Quick calculation, ct need about 1k xp each couting member a day to keep up with you value gain from roids, on top of that you prob have more bonus and get xp from def.

Difference with ult is...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 19 Apr 2016, 09:35
Replies: 539
Views: 34,663
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 who will win

yea it's a waste, but doubt many in Norse actually want to play active again. Some do a round or two in a more serious alliance, but if they don't have time putting in a shift they return.

Most...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 16 Apr 2016, 23:49
Replies: 539
Views: 34,663
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 who will win

Yea i know everyone can def, thats what i pointed out. Norse is an ally that dont call ppl to def or even have a single dc, but we cover quite a lot each round. Last round we even dced a bit a few...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 16 Apr 2016, 22:24
Replies: 539
Views: 34,663
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 who will win

Theodd won? Interesting:) also norse def is as good as we want it to be. Ask fl and p3n. If we want to cover shit we so, but most night we cba. We retal instead. This round we dont really do pols...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 9 Apr 2016, 00:12
Replies: 539
Views: 34,663
Posted By Sandvold
Thumbs up Re: R66 who will win

Can vouch for that :)
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2016, 06:19
Replies: 539
Views: 34,663
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 who will win

Mainly cath/zik CR
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Mar 2016, 16:50
Replies: 278
Views: 9,642
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65 Inc stats

I'm not 100% sure of which night advantix is talking about, and not do I really care, we didn't have any deals with ult at that time and we did gal raids. I guess we just picked an Ult gal and hit...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Mar 2016, 14:44
Replies: 278
Views: 9,642
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65 Inc stats

But who listens to Advantix!? :P We talk about the politics several times a day and not once did it come up that we felt P3n had broken any deal. I don't even think we had any deals with p3n that...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Mar 2016, 13:34
Replies: 278
Views: 9,642
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65 Inc stats

Yea, I only tried to clearify what advantix wrote when munkee asked. It wasn't related to any spesific deals this round. And I don't think anyone in Norse felt p3n or FL for that mather was breaking...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Mar 2016, 12:07
Replies: 278
Views: 9,642
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65 Inc stats

No spesific deals, more in general. If we had joined vs Ult and Ult had gone down, we felt it likely that one of the members in the block would turn vs us to profit from xp.

From our dealings...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Mar 2016, 10:57
Replies: 497
Views: 23,088
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65. Who wins?

Interesting that you got told 5 days in advance, I didn't even know then. As we said in the eorc, we had one goal, stop the first alliance that hit us to win. P3n tried twice, but they didn't really...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 7 Mar 2016, 10:39
Replies: 169
Views: 5,412
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 Stat opinions

The xmas server is papadocs stats. There is some issues with etd that's known about. Think targeting is close to finished, but effs haven't been worked on
Forum: Strategic Discussions 5 Mar 2016, 00:55
Replies: 109
Views: 4,075
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r66 Changes

I'm just wondering why?
Forum: Strategic Discussions 4 Mar 2016, 14:08
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

This is actually quite right. The balancing is decent, some small issues, but I guess they know about it. The fort aspect is what's bothering quite a lot of ppl.

Not sure if voteing would be the...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 1 Mar 2016, 19:48
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

You got to be an idiot tbh. Ppl said you were a troll and i guess they were right.
Forum: Strategic Discussions 1 Mar 2016, 15:33
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

Magical? Like it's been the 5 rounds since I returned. Possibility to play value in an alliance without forting. We've done that in norse since the first round without problems. Now it's not...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 1 Mar 2016, 13:57
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

Yea, and then you are only left with xp. Which i personally think is retarded.
Forum: Strategic Discussions 1 Mar 2016, 12:37
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

Anyway how you put it, these stats is not possible to play in any other way then xp or forts. Random is not an option if you want to go for value, there is no way for an alliance to cover inc without...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 1 Mar 2016, 12:21
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

100% agree with everything you posted. A good fence gal is just as efficent as a good fort, as long as politics allows it.

However when you can't rund an alliance properly, without either forting...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 1 Mar 2016, 12:17
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

Exactly.
You didn't get the irony part, sorry about that. These stats promotes forting. Aka 4+ players of same alliance in same bp, since you have so much downwards firing.

I know perfectly...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 1 Mar 2016, 11:01
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

So if you have a fort agreement you have only 4 kinds of ships, and not 4-5 players from the same alliance?

So it should be called a fence agreement?
Forum: Strategic Discussions 1 Mar 2016, 10:02
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

I agree that you can always build a strong gal and make a fort no mather the stats. But when you don't have the possibility with ally def in most cases it demands forting.
Forum: Strategic Discussions 1 Mar 2016, 10:01
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

Downward firing, no posibility of ally def, so it is smart to put 5 ppl from same ally with same strat into a gal is something I say is a fort. I don't care if you split in 3-4-5 ships. As long as...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 1 Mar 2016, 07:27
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

I agree that it will be a problem no mather what. But this forces forts.

Xp or fort, that's the two only options you got with this set
Forum: Strategic Discussions 1 Mar 2016, 07:25
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

Targeting won't be changed much. It passes Jintao's targeting matrix. Which makes the set balanced in his eyes. I don't think putting stats in a matrix is the way to show it's balanced, but we...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 29 Feb 2016, 23:13
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

I agree zik fi/etd fi works, again as a fort if u want to keep the darn roids.

But isnt it quite strange to make a set for gals of 6-7 planets and we got no indication for this happening?
Forum: Strategic Discussions 29 Feb 2016, 17:45
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

First of as long as BP's isn't reduced galaxy size is more likely to be 10 at the eor.

Was at work, did some calcs now, and yea the illusion work. Just seemed wierd, also when it doesn't apply for...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 29 Feb 2016, 16:13
Replies: 278
Views: 9,642
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65 Inc stats

Just to take the argument in another direction. I have no proof or any reason to think Ult cheats. Good at the game sure, but cheaters no idea and no reason to think so.

But lets say GM or Munkee...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 29 Feb 2016, 15:50
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

To bad you can't keep em if you're not forted:P
Forum: Strategic Discussions 29 Feb 2016, 13:52
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

Totally agree. When many don't want forting I think it's rather retarded a set that encourage forting as much as this set does.

At least give the option of forting, xp and valueplay without forts....
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 29 Feb 2016, 13:48
Replies: 47
Views: 1,625
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Change of buddypack system

Next round everyone will fort with the stats suggested so i guess the problem will be even bigger
Forum: Strategic Discussions 29 Feb 2016, 12:43
Replies: 112
Views: 4,312
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R66 ship stats

These stats doesn't just encurage forting, it made it to fort or go for xp.

You say FI is offensive, only thing you can roid is other etds (if you got enough), xan (if you got enough) and terran....
Forum: Alliance Discussions 26 Feb 2016, 21:16
Replies: 497
Views: 23,088
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65. Who wins?

Should have tåken the bet:)
Forum: Alliance Discussions 26 Feb 2016, 19:33
Replies: 497
Views: 23,088
Posted By Sandvold
Forum: Alliance Discussions 26 Feb 2016, 19:28
Replies: 497
Views: 23,088
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65. Who wins?

What odds do u give vs faceless?
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 26 Feb 2016, 14:25
Replies: 83
Views: 2,187
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r66 - The Random One

That was the inital suggestion
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 25 Feb 2016, 02:21
Replies: 83
Views: 2,187
Posted By Sandvold
Re: r66 - The Random One

So except eksero that want private gals, so he don't need to abuse the exile system like they got to today. Does anyone have any good reasons for not reducing bp size?
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 23 Feb 2016, 19:36
Replies: 21
Views: 1,225
Posted By Sandvold
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 23 Feb 2016, 17:29
Replies: 21
Views: 1,225
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Alliance limits 40/60 split

I agree. 20 planets you can "hide" or have as def planets is to much. I would prefer it back to 50 if tag limits isn't changed, and i don't think I it would help much decreasing ally size. It's not...
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 23 Feb 2016, 08:14
Replies: 47
Views: 1,625
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Change of buddypack system

I know p3n usually don't fort, and I totally get your point about making it easier. But as I see it, when all alliances except norse and HR got over half their people forted then most the playerbase...
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 22 Feb 2016, 22:21
Replies: 47
Views: 1,625
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Change of buddypack system

Not those few gals I want to stop, there is always ways to go around a system.
However now you pretty much have to fort. At least it seems like most alliances seems to think so. Put 5 guys in a gal,...
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 22 Feb 2016, 21:32
Replies: 47
Views: 1,625
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Change of buddypack system

Did you read the suggestion? That's why limiting bp's to 2 or 3, then mix two and two bp's. Gals wouldn't be smaller then. Same size as today.
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 22 Feb 2016, 20:40
Replies: 47
Views: 1,625
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Change of buddypack system

Personally I don't mind if Ult win or lose. But the problem as I see it is that everyone is forted. So if you hit one gal you are almost at war.

Check through the uni atm, almost every gal that do...
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 22 Feb 2016, 20:09
Replies: 47
Views: 1,625
Posted By Sandvold
Change of buddypack system

This started as an observation from AD, but as booji mentioned it probably should be in here.

This round pretty much every alliance did fort. This led to a very static univers and same few gals...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 22 Feb 2016, 20:02
Replies: 497
Views: 23,088
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65. Who wins?

Why is everyone agreeing! This is AD ppl should disagree no mather what. Yea i might get around to posting it as a suggestion. But the posted more as an observation and me posting a reason for Ult's...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 22 Feb 2016, 17:54
Replies: 497
Views: 23,088
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65. Who wins?

I posted something about this during the weekend, but deleted the post since ppl was just discussing things that had happened 2-3 rounds back.

Maybe it's time to try getting the discussion going...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 22 Feb 2016, 14:30
Replies: 497
Views: 23,088
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65. Who wins?

So if you are a football club that does worse then expected, like Chelsea this season. If they went on to win the league it would be considered a comeback even tough they've done bad all season.
...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 22 Feb 2016, 14:09
Replies: 497
Views: 23,088
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65. Who wins?

Looks like it will be an interesting finish.

6 mill difference in top 4 and CT got a huge roid lead.

At the moment I would bet on CT coming from behind and wins this round. Will be a great...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 18 Feb 2016, 23:35
Replies: 497
Views: 23,088
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65. Who wins?

Tbh we've attacked ult far more then p3n this round:) So no we're not playing for ult, but yea we didn't want to be a part of the gangbang on ult. FL+p3n+ND+CT should be able to do this without us.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 16 Feb 2016, 17:36
Replies: 497
Views: 23,088
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65. Who wins?

So as i said with 60% bonus, which is my estimate it amounts to 9.8 mill. That top 40 of ult players sit on most of the roids is very likely, so the 10k roids is fair esitmate. Still a far way up 8...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 16 Feb 2016, 16:11
Replies: 497
Views: 23,088
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R65. Who wins?

Hmm, not sure what you're calcing. If you say we have an avg bonus of 60% (i don't think it's that high) and we have 10k more roids in avg (4kish atm). We would gain 9,8 mill on ult before round...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 8 Jan 2016, 02:29
Replies: 320
Views: 12,143
Posted By Sandvold
Forum: Strategic Discussions 26 Dec 2015, 02:13
Replies: 114
Views: 9,653
Posted By Sandvold
Re: BB stats r65(again)

What i find most svart about this thread isnt the stats, its that the stats wizard tia is making no sense. First xan unplayable. Then xan fr cant land ter bs (which 90% would land) then show a new...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 4 Dec 2015, 17:14
Replies: 434
Views: 29,764
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R64 predictions

Even if it was farming what can they do? The rules states:

Farming is defined as: an agreement between the attacker(s) and defender(s) where one or both benefit. This includes farming roids,...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 3 Dec 2015, 21:11
Replies: 434
Views: 29,764
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R64 predictions

Yea but you're ult:P He's basically an joeseph/ult drone already. Get him to play for you instead! ****ed up for two alliances in one round, got to be some kind of record:)
Forum: Alliance Discussions 3 Dec 2015, 21:01
Replies: 434
Views: 29,764
Posted By Sandvold
Re: R64 predictions

Trusting offmind to do anything vs ult have to be the biggest mistake ever. Or trusting offmind at all would probably be stupid
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 11 Oct 2015, 21:37
Replies: 307
Views: 17,286
Posted By Sandvold
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 8 Sep 2015, 21:13
Replies: 21
Views: 1,487
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Minor change to prelaunch/inc scans

We in Norsemen attack at any point in the day, not much harder landning morning attacks then night attacks. Even FC's and solo attacks midday works great. It's more a questions about available def...
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 5 Sep 2015, 19:42
Replies: 67
Views: 6,862
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Alliance size

I think you misunderstand why trolltags as you call it FC. 98% of the time we only retal our incomming. But when a full tag ally hits us we can't retal all inc, so how can we try to keep them away?...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 4 Jun 2007, 15:27
Replies: 152
Views: 6,537
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Congratulations Greenhills

Actually useing the support rule within a galaxy would be as stupid as use it within an alliance.

It would never work
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 4 Jun 2007, 14:59
Replies: 152
Views: 6,537
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Congratulations Greenhills

Jepp I would argue with you:P

First of all your logic is flawed and you can't quote a part of the eula without thinking true what effects it would have.

First of all Greenhills stocked his...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 2 Jun 2007, 10:18
Replies: 152
Views: 6,537
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Congratulations Greenhills

Angels had nothing to do about it. They didn't even know about it:p So not to much for conratulating them for. Except Assasin who was kind enough to point out to the trigger-happy Fiery that nothing...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 2 Jun 2007, 00:02
Replies: 152
Views: 6,537
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Congratulations Greenhills

To sum abit up as beeing a part of the galaxy and one of the contributers for this to work.

First I would like to say that i feel sorry for Kile and FeniX and the rest of top10.
The point with...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 1 Jun 2007, 21:58
Replies: 152
Views: 6,537
Posted By Sandvold
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 1 Jun 2007, 21:52
Replies: 152
Views: 6,537
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Congratulations Greenhills

Greenhills is a person:P

and he's not CT:)
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 1 Jun 2007, 21:27
Replies: 152
Views: 6,537
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Congratulations Greenhills

Gd round greenhills. Another great round beeing in gal with you:P

Next time it's my turn to win!!!
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 1 Jun 2007, 21:25
Replies: 28
Views: 1,649
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Resource Donation

No it need to be based on both score and value. Greenhills was below on value, but not on score, he was one of the highest ranked in score because of xp.

That's why he got the res.

So get a...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 14 Dec 2006, 12:04
Replies: 244
Views: 6,114
Posted By Sandvold
Re: Round 20 Changes

I agree with Sleepless. 3 in a BP is to little to be certain of decent gal (2*2 is even more unsecure), look at how many gals that disbanded last round when most had 5 ppl in a BP and at least could...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 6 Jul 2005, 02:22
Replies: 231
Views: 4,605
Posted By Sandvold
Re: the NEW exeption system!

I've followed this post and the scenario that Jester made to see what people think about the new exeption system. I've played PA from r 1-7 and now from r 12 and followed most the post in the forums...
Showing results 1 to 164 of 164

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013