User Name
Password

Go Back   Planetarion Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page Search Results

Showing results 1 to 84 of 84
Search took 0.01 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: Anaram
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 30 Dec 2005, 06:03
Replies: 58
Views: 21,883
Posted By Anaram
Re: Espionage

Hasn't the whole purpose of waves/scans system since time immemorial been to give advantage to big organized alliances and to players with (multi) scan planets? Why the sudden change of heart?
Forum: Strategic Discussions 22 Oct 2004, 16:42
Replies: 14
Views: 3,580
Posted By Anaram
Re: When do finance centers become more useful than mines?

A bit off topic, but...

60th finance center will cost about 70k or more of each resource (assuming 10 mines here).

If you have 2,000 asteroids, that finance center will add about 2,500 res per...
Forum: Strategic Discussions 21 Oct 2004, 21:54
Replies: 28
Views: 61,473
Posted By Anaram
Re: Useful Links: Round 12

I just made a new compilation of my mIRC based attack bot "Warmonger" available to the public (the bot itself has been available for 6 months now or so, just not very much advertised).
...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 25 May 2004, 20:47
Replies: 116
Views: 17,954
Posted By Anaram
Re: Massive scanning - rank #1 point of view

It was clear from the moment EXP formulas were released that if surface analysis scans gave any positive integer amount of EXP at all, they would be vastly superior as means for gaining score when...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 26 Apr 2004, 16:52
Replies: 254
Views: 21,675
Posted By Anaram
Re: The best Alliance(s) this round

I will have to agree with this, and add that this appears to be the case almost always with the first blockfight of a round - one block has clearly superior numbers. During rounds which have seen...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 22 Apr 2004, 10:06
Replies: 17
Views: 3,370
Posted By Anaram
Re: Threatening behaviour

This kind of behaviour is lame to the extreme.

If you're going to threaten a planet, at least do it with some panache.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 14 Apr 2004, 01:37
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

This (=reporting) idea was discussed and discarded. Where "authorized" retals have gotten people closed before, it's been general consensus that it should not be. When Gorgoroth got closed in r9.5...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Apr 2004, 20:03
Replies: 75
Views: 6,697
Posted By Anaram
Re: To Wolfpack, Love Me

About 10 days ago it should have been clear to most that elysium&co was losing this war. It's also easy to say in retrospect that the sheer numbers dictated the outcome of the round from tick 0. From...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Apr 2004, 19:23
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Life is as life does, haven't really bothered with getting back the roids. This thread is almost out of breath already so I'm sure it'll die on it's own, and I doubt I'll bother posting here except...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Apr 2004, 18:37
Replies: 75
Views: 6,697
Posted By Anaram
Re: To Wolfpack, Love Me

Frankly, I'd put equal blame on this to anyone accepting the alliance with WP, not just -on- WP. Just my opinion though.

EDIT: personally, I think I put more blame on FPM than on WP for this, but...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Apr 2004, 18:29
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Hardly. Opinionated, definitely.

I have, however, gotten quite clear statements as to why people who leave FAnG are roided (= to set an example) and how people have left FAnG during previous...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Apr 2004, 12:12
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

In fact, even this single statement (which is in effect arguing with me) seems to make your previous claim of "not going to argue" lie. Also, I've pointed out a serious of your lies (based, perhaps,...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Apr 2004, 11:56
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

/me waves goodbye.

Maybe next time you can try basing your posts a bit more on facts and a bit less on lies :D
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Apr 2004, 11:55
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I like the way FAnG people are effectively saying that "we sucked so bad in the past members started leaving, and we suck now too, but at least we can bully them to stay now".
Forum: Alliance Discussions 13 Apr 2004, 11:51
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I never said such a thing. If you insist on posting, at least stop posting outright lies.


They surely will, since they know that leaving FAnG will simply get their asses roided :)
I don't know...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 12 Apr 2004, 22:49
Replies: 17
Views: 2,914
Posted By Anaram
Re: Shame on you!

Roiding newbies was way too easily the superior option to roiding experienced players with a decent alliance. On the other hand, 100 member limit for alliances, and the impossibility for free planets...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 9 Apr 2004, 11:04
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Nope, what you stated effectivly comes together as claiming I was not what I seemed. And that, is a totally different matter.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 9 Apr 2004, 03:43
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

This is becoming a pattern in FAnG responses. You refuse to give a statement that would you can not revoke at a whim, just like Forest's "official stance".

My only clue is that you might have...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 9 Apr 2004, 03:20
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I know phk galmembers of mine recalled their defence. I also know that WP galmember of mine informed me that his HC contacted him about the defence he sent.

EDIT: "contacted" on this context means...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 9 Apr 2004, 03:16
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I'm not talking of yours roiding me anymore with respect to yours dodging. I'm talking of yours badmouthing me to my friends.

EDIT: That you should roid me is something I woulde have passed by...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 9 Apr 2004, 03:15
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

You manage to state both that the problems were remedied and that I should have waited longer for them to resolve. Which one did you actually mean?
Forum: Alliance Discussions 9 Apr 2004, 03:13
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Why should I contact a person of no ranking in FAnG whatsover, when BCs and HCs refuse to answer the question?
Forum: Alliance Discussions 8 Apr 2004, 18:00
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Colt: I'll post what evidence I either have or don't have to that question the moment I see you denying it.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 8 Apr 2004, 17:56
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Since I've gotten repeated refusals to comment on something, perhaps you'd like to give it a shot at explaining why FAnG HCs before the round promised that FAnG would not be roiding neutrals in FAnG...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 8 Apr 2004, 17:44
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Could you fangers post one post without telling me to "deal with it already". You seem to imply that the only reason I'm posting here is that I'm feeling bitter. Frankly though, there's a whole lot...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 8 Apr 2004, 15:29
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I'll quote myself then, so as to not explain all this over again.

[QUOTE]
the way these attacks get organized gives me serious headache
I mean that quite literally
I have to stay up guarding...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 8 Apr 2004, 13:00
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Clearly he is, there's 190+ posts in this thread, and this post is not only FAnG business now is it. The only way you can make this only your business is by force, trying to squelch all conversation....
Forum: Alliance Discussions 8 Apr 2004, 12:45
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Pray, tell me, what has this got to do with anything?
Forum: Alliance Discussions 8 Apr 2004, 12:42
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

So what you are saying is that FAnG would no longer ever do this, regardless of if the other alliance had 5 or 95 members? You would always first find out if the person you are talking to was, in...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 8 Apr 2004, 12:37
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I bet 190 posts in this thread that you are wrong :devil:
Forum: Alliance Discussions 8 Apr 2004, 12:14
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I don't know what all this behind your backs business is. I made a deal and told it right out to FAnG people. You weren't let in on the deal because it was arranged in PM, but I did immediately let...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 23:02
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I don't mind flames that much. If I did mind flames, I probably would rip off my Internet connection. If flames are the price for the few pieces of actual content, then it's still better than no...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 22:45
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Like how fury actions and policies should never have been discussed by people not in fury... My business is what I make my business.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 22:27
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

The reaction to such action, however, is everyone's right. When the information is available, everyone will formulate their own opinions. Some agree with FAnG action, some disagree. Nobody will...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 21:45
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Seriously half the time I can't follow what you are attempting say. What you are saying is, is something to the effect:

"The first part [of what?] is so much a lie that you [effectively?] stated...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 21:03
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

To the best of my understanding, you were attempting to justify it in order to attempt to avoid bad reputation. I might be wrong there. A major reason of this thread was, of course, to attempt to...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 16:01
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I pointed out several points where you had blatantly provided misinformation.

You have not pointed out a single issue where I've contradicted myself. If there is one, state it so that I may...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 15:54
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I invoke what heartless says: please don't give vague accusations, bet two statements against each other.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 15:53
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Maybe it is that I can't read, but I can't make heads or tails out of this. I parted with FAnG fully informing them that I was intenting to join Phraktos, if someone in FAnG didn't know that, it's...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 15:46
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I was directed to talk with alch about leaving by LB|away. If they didn't want alch to speak for them, they should maybe not have directed me to him...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 15:44
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Lie1: I left because joining FAnG attacks was too difficult to me


Lie2: Suddenly I'm "calculative" and I organized a "defection". I did not defect. I left to another alliance fighting on the...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 15:35
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

This is typical. First your guys flame me for posting logs of other people, then you flame me for posting logs of myself out of context. If you get alch to give me permission to post that entire...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 15:31
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

This is a LIE. If you make inquisitions, you will find that I have left wolfpack during round 8(?) when WEET block was clearly winning with the intention to join NO alliance whatsoever (nor did I). I...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 15:18
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

There's so many lies here I don't even know where to start. Let me quote MYSELF from conversations with alch:
(when inquired by alch where I was going)
[01:38:55] <Anaram> phraktos I do believe
^^...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 15:09
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I had stated to Phraktos HC that I was seriously contemplating departing from FAnG for the reasons that it was becoming impossible for me to participate in their attacks. I had not AGREED to join,...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 14:54
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Since I've only tried with FAnG, I can't rightly make claims. However, if there's an alliance HC there who thinks that their alliance would not roid (or impose on any other such nasty consequences) a...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 14:50
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

It appears to me as if you are giving the minimal response possible just to annoy me. Also I find this official stance business quite ludicrous - it's like saying "I can make a statement now and...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 14:43
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

1) They were not addressed.
2) I did no longer trust for HC to fix it.

You are asking me to stay in the alliance where I don't trust the HCs.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 14:29
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

My complaint was never on the number of attacks. My complaint was on being able to join the attacks. Observe a difference?
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 14:27
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

If adjustments were made, should I have been made aware of them, for I certainly did not notice the points I made being filled. And those points were not unreasonable. I only asked for two things:...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 14:22
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Hey! We are FAnG! You can't attack if you are our member, but try to leave us and we'll roid you!
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 14:17
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I've never seen ruling by terror as anything but pathetic. For the record: I do not see myself as defecting when I'm still fighting the same front.

Also Forest: I do not appreciate the comments...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 14:04
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

There comes a time in waiting when you will no longer wait. I will not sit back indefinitely and wait for the "we are getting there ASAP". Can you give me an exact number of days which would have...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 13:56
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I'm not here solely to stop and whine and act bitter. I'm also here to share information - I'd not have joined FAnG had I known this is the sort of leadership one can expect. With this thread, maybe...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 12:58
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I have no idea what you mean, and that is the God's honest truth.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 12:55
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I expected that this would be the case, and in calling you liar I was being harch and unfair - I knew that it was a matter of ignorance. My apologies.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 12:51
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Well, I should point out again that it was promised quite clearly by the HC that neutral planets in FAnG galaxies would not get attacked (and my galaxy is still a FAnG galaxy too). And at this stage...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 12:46
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I any case I think I've pinpointed my mistake. Not having played round 10 (beyond first week) and not having followed alliance politics thereafter, I assumed that this was still old planetarion,...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 12:22
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Why should it not have been posted, it is clearly a post on the way a top alliance handles their affairs.

As to the question: I don't see anything wrong with recruiting from your allies. This...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 12:20
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

But only if they are FAnG... right?
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 12:11
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

So what you are stating that quotes I have (BUT WILL NOT POST, DON'T START ON IT AGAIN) from two fang officers are bogus, made up, void, that I should expect even more incomings from FAnG? The plot...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 10:48
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

My statement might be somewhat inaccurate but by no means totally.

EDIT: Would you perhaps like to state - for example - that you didn't pick a target in an attack outside of FAnG at a time when...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 10:35
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

As I already stated I took this issue up multiple times on channels and once in PM with a HC (5 days before leaving) and once with BC(~~ three days before leaving), but there's only so many times one...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 10:17
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

WP / Phraktos members got ordered to recall their defence boats by their HCs, and there's an extent beyond which I'm not willing to jeopardise their rounds with this issue. FAnG said they would...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 09:41
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

72 hours to be exact. It's a game so I will do my very best to make sure FAnG will take the highest possible respect loss for this, if indeed people think it's something for which respect would be...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 06:06
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

It's quite ludicrous that you still choose to attack me on pasting a private convo even when I quite plainly stated that I might be doing so before that conversation. If I told you "Sure, feel free...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 05:51
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

I would have to say that it is practically impossible to attempt to defend with the current ETA system, you need to spend 72 hours jgp'ing a planet with thumbs up. Let's not blame phraktos for that,...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 04:13
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Oh, I totally forgot to mention the development in the situation. 3 waves without defence has been agreed to be given on FAnG, first of those waves being Forest (worth about 300 roids for losses that...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 04:05
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

This is from private conversation from LB|away prior to the quote made above. I don't think I need a permission to quote myself, at least?
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 04:03
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

To the extent that they can, which means: not really. Now, perhaps it's a good idea for the sake of the discussion that I describe the events a bit more thoroughly.

Firstly, when I joined FAnG, I...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 01:54
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

That explains a bit, heh. It's still a bit disappointing to get despite attempts to make the post as (mostly, heh, not quite entirely I grant you that) neutral as possible.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 01:36
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Talking Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

Yes, you got it absolutely right. No question.

EDIT: lol man, did you even read my post :p
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 01:24
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Re: Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

He did, but he was still HC at the time.
Forum: Alliance Discussions 7 Apr 2004, 01:09
Replies: 370
Views: 23,445
Posted By Anaram
Your classic "pld" thread (at FAnG)

So I'm sitting here in front of my computer clapping hands at the incomings I've been offered courtesy of Furious Angels. The following I think quite well summarises the situation:


This chat...
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 25 Mar 2004, 00:14
Replies: 9
Views: 2,191
Posted By Anaram
Re: Scythes...

I'll hazard a guess that ships which are both frozen and subverted would still fire, though I have no evidence whatsoever on this.
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 24 Mar 2004, 15:04
Replies: 10
Views: 2,496
Posted By Anaram
Re: a little weird tickplan

no reasonable cathaar, terran, or zikonian could do anything but those 5 researches in that particujlar order first.

For xandathrii, I don't agree on the placement of core extraction.

Kinda...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 13 Mar 2004, 02:38
Replies: 73
Views: 8,232
Posted By Anaram
Re: R6B & SG Finals

It didn't really matter squat how good they were though. At tick 48 it was clear as sky that the opposition stood no chance.

--

Fernandez: you didn't ruin the second day, even in the best...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 13 Mar 2004, 01:09
Replies: 13
Views: 2,771
Posted By Anaram
Re: Cost and payments?

Even the first covert-ops for free ones (hampers research) is quite annoying though, if not actually beneficial for the planet doing it. IMO, covert ops from free planets shouldn't be able to hurt...
Forum: Planetarion Suggestions 12 Mar 2004, 11:50
Replies: 32
Views: 3,248
Posted By Anaram
Re: An empty fleet spot shouldn't be returning!

personally, I've never liked the fact that you get the fleet slot back if the fleet gets destroyed, that difference between 0 ships surviving and 1 ship surviving could in those situations...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 11 Mar 2004, 15:40
Replies: 4
Views: 2,148
Posted By Anaram
Smile It's been a while...

...since I was positively surprised by Planetarion, but I've had more fun with planetarion beta than I've had with any fast tick game for ages. Some of the frustrating features of old still remain...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 9 Mar 2004, 19:59
Replies: 73
Views: 8,232
Posted By Anaram
Re: R6B & SG Finals

I'm sad to say that this was one of the worst speedrounds I ever wasted time on. I quit the round during the first break, and returned back at the end of the first day as well as playing Sunday...
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 4 Jun 2003, 13:54
Replies: 60
Views: 8,716
Posted By Anaram
The proper way to be noobish at start is first to...

The proper way to be noobish at start is first to build reflectors accidentially, then fail your sector scan quest by blocking - when scanning yourself.
Forum: Planetarion Discussions 4 Jun 2003, 10:58
Replies: 60
Views: 8,716
Posted By Anaram
Re: Re: You're gal sucks if...

Hah, but you didn't notice it said "ships", not "a ship" ;)
Forum: Strategic Discussions 4 Jun 2003, 10:54
Replies: 9
Views: 3,242
Posted By Anaram
Attacking cathaar is now even less risky with...

Attacking cathaar is now even less risky with news scans for all attacks. In the old times, there was a possibility of kill-ship-defence that would catch your fleet. Nowadays, there isn't even that.
Showing results 1 to 84 of 84

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:33.
Planetarion - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018