Ultores
Not often that CT speaks on here...
We have failed in every method we could think of to get xVx off the fence, from pleading with them, to using force, to agreeing to their demands for end of round nap. There is nothing left for us to do now but to pretty much take on ults with the little support we have. Any alliance that is too cowardly to help will be taken care of at some point, be it this round or next! anyone wanting to help, you know who to contact. CT is not strong enough for this and nether are our allies! My only regret is we didn't just fight ults from the start but we didn't feel that we should fight xVx's war for them! Will see how long we last! GL and let the flames start :/ |
Re: Ultores
:crymeariver:
|
Re: Ultores
was only "xvx's war" when ct and nd became too useless to run for top, dont talk about them as if they were the only ones who were ever in the running to fight us
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
I have said to you many times GM ... Fix CT's defence culture, you wont win a round until you do.
|
Re: Ultores
So in clear you are bitching that xvx does not backstab its ally?
Wow.. |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
And lets face it here boys and girls. no alliance plays for 'fun' i dont care what you say. You never hear a player say (seriously maybe in a joke way) 'oh look im 700th... and bin roided to the ground... but im happy!' That doesnt happen. You play to win and PA turned its back on galaxy wins and planet wins a long time ago... hence why alliance rankings was invented (it wasnt origonaly in PA) based on the fact people turned it into an alliance based game. So no.. no one was bitching at xvx for sitting on the fence as such, what they are bitching about is xvx had a shot at winning and respectfully winning by earning it. But chose to stagnate the round and sit there at second napped to first with the same crap excuse off 'we are neutral and play for planet ranks/gals' in an alliance based game. Which lets face it they have been all round. Good luck to CT and anyone that joins them for trying to save whats left of the round. |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
If you're speaking purely of alliances, I'd challenge you to talk to alliances like HR, DFWTK, ToF, NGO, etc. I don't mean to sound derogatory, but if HC's are being honest with themselves they know they probably won't come first in the alliance rankings. I know for a fact people in ToF enjoy being there because they can help new players and enjoy a different experience than those in some of the more stressful top alliances. Either way, I'm sorry, but it's just not true. You're trying to make a generalization that doesn't work. |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
In a way im glad Ult have won the round. They won the round on skill and are full of great players as we all know. If xvx had of won, then we know it would of been becuase of 2 reasons 1) They would of managed to actually out roid Ult while being napped to them and avoiding them. or 2) They would of bin awarded the win through this 'contract' agreement where no one would hit them after everyone had hit ult. So.. bassicaly the easy route either way. Well Done ult |
Re: Ultores
Finaly some action.
Why didnt we have forest coming out and declaring war when we decided to have war? |
Re: Ultores
I have a family now, my war days are over...
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
No, we would of helped xVx :/
|
Re: Ultores
But since they didn't hit us, you just figured "nah, we're not even gonna bother trying on our own"?
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
since you allied
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
I swear you do not even bother reading peoples posts.. GM just said he was going to fight Ult solo anyway a) get some new glasses b) go back to school c) stop posting on here |
Re: Ultores
lol this thread is nothing more than just trying to make a sad face and hope that xvx ppl that read this crap feel uncomfortable and get into the GB as well :P nothing more to it
as far as things are with sharing def between xvx/ult.. yeah ult has defended them and xvx has defended us.. thats what allys do.. whats the problem here? cheers to the xvx ppl that didnt fall for this shit! and gl to the block hittin ultores (DLR, Apprime, Consp, FanG, where is ND btw?) - may there be wealthy salvage donation ahead of us :D |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
He said he regret not hitting ult early on because he didnt wan't to fight xvx's fight. But seeing as they didn't hit us, ct didnt even bother to try on their own.. And he also didn't say in his OP that he was going to fight ult solo. |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
xvx is a joke, end of.. and i blame chimpie and whoever else is influencing xvx pols |
Re: Ultores
I would like to congratulate NewDawn! Well done!
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
a) for kneelings down and doing something with their mouths b) for bending over and taking something in their arses |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
pm DigitalZero for details. |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
On the other hand, Ultores defending xVx is actually a stroke of genius. Ultores are clearly better roiders than xVx, so if sharing defense means the status quo persists, the means Ultores will win the round. The best way to do that is by 1) getting as much defense as possible, for example by enlisting other alliances to defend you and 2) keeping xVx docile, for example by offering to defend them. Napping xVx is killing two birds with one very clever stone. CT & co could take the easy way out and attack xVx for its "betrayal", but that would just give Ultores an even bigger lead. It would also piss off xVx, who would then tighten their alliance with the honourable Ultores. Considering that they are already unwilling to break with Ultores, there's clearly nothing to be gained by attacking xVx. So this is the right move by CT. That doesn't mean they're guaranteed to succeed, not by any means. Ultores has 2 alliances worth of defence to counter this block. If CT & co can't break through that, this will have been a wasted effort. But if they can, and if they gain enough to endanger Ultores' lead and if they do it fast enough, then that puts xVx in a tight spot, because if that happens, they surely will be next in line. Those are a lot of ifs though. Quote:
Personally, given all of the above, my bet is on Ultores. Nevertheless, kudos to gm for trying. |
Re: Ultores
Buying Gm's crap only makes you stupid. There are more sides to a story than that of a sulking CT.
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
meh.. though they did hit xvx :P so u missed that part :)
and i just love hunter`s posts :D:D:D |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
just seems CT/fang have spent the whole round staying away from ult in the hope xvx will fight them, and so then ct/fang could reap the rewards afterwards, but everyome is now whining because that plan has clearly not happened and they have realised its near enough too late for them to do anything substantial. just take this loss on the chin, and in future grow a pair and fight yourself if you want a chance
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
I will tell you on a general basis, only checking out the story of one side in a disagreement before making up your conclutions doesnt make you seem as intelligent as you might be tho. You have some perfectly valid facts in your post, and some assumptions thats way off. Carry on eating the propaganda. |
Re: Ultores
Not sure why anyone's saying xVx will finish 2nd, it's going to be a far stretch for them to finish 4th with the ass backwards way they did politics this round.
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
I can't deny that xVx have given us the win (providing we don't fold to incs). But surely we have all realized now that allegiances in this game don't just last 1 round, they carry on for the time that those alliances remain are loyal to each other, and as it happens, Ult and xVx are very loyal as it has on many occasions been just the 2 of us vs the rest. You can't expect xVx to end that friendship so easily (I don't know if this contract thing is true or not, there's been no proof for myself) so for now i won't necessarily believe it :) it is a shame the round had turned out to be so quiet and boring at the start, but that can't be blamed solely on xVx, there are many others.
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
One would think the obvious thing to do was to go for easy roids, and make sure you dont lose roids in your own tag not use fleets to def the tag above you? :(
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
Re: Ultores
I would like to point out that in the midst of xVx's whinning that with regards to ult all that CT had really asked is that they stay out of the fight. They have somehow interpreted this as CT requested they fight ult solo, talk about trying to spin a story....
The real shame here is xVx and Ult decided before the round started to block and to attempt hide this fact until they had roided everyone else. We had xVx HC assure us during the first week of the round that they were not working with ult, meanwhile ult and xVx attacked everyone but each other. (I challenge xVx/Ult to prove me wrong here by posting how they were even close to being each other's top hostiles... here is a hint, they can't) I would like to point out that this is the first round since App won where there have been significant blocks, and this is entirely because of the intentional effort of xVx and ult. CT has consistently and intentionally avoided blocking over the last few rounds in part to keep the game interesting. Last round we spent much of the round at war with Ult (our doing not ults) while ND happily fenced to the top. When given the choice of blocking with ND and letting them walk to the win, or turning on ND, we turned on ND, not because we dislike ND, but because it was better for the game (and CTs only chance of winning ourselves) to take them on. ND fought valiantly, and in the end we both lost to a fenced Ult, but at least it made the round interesting. Ult and xVx seem to feel it is better for the game that they block together and use xVx as a shield to get ult to it's 3rd win in a row. Good tactics by ult, for whom I have much respect for in this strategy, but a complete failure of nerve by the xVx HC, who have sacrificed any chance of their own ally win to give ult a three-peat. |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
It's just how the game works. Top tier alliances don't settle for 2nd. |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
-Munin- <[DDK]gm> disbanding the big asc fence gals will help you <Game> fence gals? <[DDK]gm> yeah <Game> what fence gals do we have? <[DDK]gm> gal full of asc planets, not many alliances with hit them for fear of pissing asc off <[DDK]gm> = uber fence <Game> lol thats not a fence <[DDK]gm> in a way it is Quote:
(Hint: I'm not sorry) |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
im wondering if u guys really think these things ureselves or is it a job well done by you`re HC`s talking bullshit like that into yer heads? |
Re: Ultores
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:15. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018