Restrict defence to galaxy/alliance
 

We all know on both sides people are cheating with multi's (farms/defplanets, hi Zwanstic, hi XoCa) and Multihunters are doing shit about it.
I think for a starter it would be a good thing that only people in your Galaxy or people in your alliance can def you, so all those support allies and planets are more or less useless.

This means Ult can only have 60 planets max, but same for App or KittenZ and the blocks would be a lot smaller too and probably the player base too if multi's/support planets stop signing up.. but it evens the alliances and probably the blocks too

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

It doesn't mind really to have those multis with nothing but def ships in tag either, less xp, but with cores being over powered, u can gain value enough to make the alliance fleet worth it.

Re: Restrict defence to galaxy/alliance
 

[Moved to a new thread. Not "tiny"]

Re: Restrict defence to galaxy/alliance
 

As much as it sucks, I think this is a reasonable response to the way alliances have attempted to circumvent the tag limit.

Re: Restrict defence to galaxy/alliance
 

Agreed this is a good approach, the support tag situation is a little out of hand.

Re: Restrict defence to galaxy/alliance
 

+ pateam refuse to respond to my post about exception rule and the fact that it allows people to create support planets under the exception and use fleet launches to get around the interaction rule

Re: Restrict defence to galaxy/alliance
 

All planets counting + only ally and gal can def would be awsome

Re: Restrict defence to galaxy/alliance
 

well last round apprime came to our aid when ct was getting targeted by kittenz and co, in some ways when a small alliance is getting picked on, its nice to be able to provide limited support.

I will clarify on my previous post, when i say pateam i mean cin and appoco. Fiery has been discussing with me but those higher up need to start listening and talking.