Second half of the round
 

So the "r62 predictions" thread was deleted cause of too many personal and off-topic insults.

Lets try again. Who's gonna win looking at the current state of politics and alliance strenghts?

Re: Second half of the round
 

Deleted?? Fck me these moderators off the wall lately.
Who got insulted?

Re: Second half of the round
 

No idea, but it was defiantly going off-topic.
So lets try to stay on topic here ;-)

Re: Second half of the round
 

Is it enough activity over here to have multiple topics?

Re: Second half of the round
 

Adapt deleted his own thread. Not me.

Re: Second half of the round
 

how many rounds ascendancy played and lost?

Re: Second half of the round
 

Like 15/22 i think?

Re: Second half of the round
 

We won 7 rounds. There has been an Ascendancy or Ascendancy-like tag for 28 rounds, including this one. Of those 28 rounds, played relatively seriously (indicated by ending top 10, a bare minimum achievement) 17 times, again including this one.

Source.

Re: Second half of the round
 

lol Adapt would

Re: Second half of the round
 

Asc. I said it preround, I said it at start of round, I have said it all round and I am saying it again now.

Re: Second half of the round
 

Well if we continue not to be hit then yeah its looking plausible, but honestly, Asc will probably collapse spectacularly if hit properly. Its gotta happen sometime surely, we are fat enough!

Re: Second half of the round
 

Plausible isnt the right term here. You'll defiantly win if you dont get hit.
Any alliance could win if it doesnt get hit all round :)

Re: Second half of the round
 

Some can even win after being hit all round. Anything is possible

Re: Second half of the round
 

What you do at home is your business, but please don't give yourself blowjobs in public, OK? :(

Re: Second half of the round
 

Well that is not possible this round.
if ult gets hit all round they cant win

Re: Second half of the round
 

Huh

Re: Second half of the round
 

Nice work there, Sherlock.

Re: Second half of the round
 

Esper said that a alliance can win being hit all round, if ult cannot do it, nobody can

Re: Second half of the round
 

So it seems Ascendancy has join the BF/CT/Bows/Norseman/Cobra block versus Ultores.
Any more news these days?

Re: Second half of the round
 

A bit silly this game, where you need 4 full tags and 2 smaller ones to keep down 1 alliance :p
I'm pretty sure everybody is having fun not getting any incs this round :)

Re: Second half of the round
 

Norse is not part of any block... We hit asc bf and ult last week.

Re: Second half of the round
 

Its the way of these boards to always add the random incs you receive into the block against you.

Re: Second half of the round
 

Cobra? What the 6 man alliance that also hits BF? And I assure you that Norse has harassed BF more than Ultores in the past week.

Re: Second half of the round
 

Cobra is the 6man ally that goes wherever bows goes. As for norse, opportunists, who can blame them ;)

Re: Second half of the round
 

Some of cobra attacked with BowS this round though, so that they WERE vs Ult is not far from the truth at some point. Not now though

Re: Second half of the round
 

Alright. For the sake of not overshadowing the real discussion, lets say Cobra isnt part of that block.
Lets say BF/CT/Bows/Asc vs. Ultores.

Re: Second half of the round
 

To use idiotic arguments of earlier threads in past rounds:
"ITS NOT OUR FAULT YOU CANT MAKE A STRONG BLOCK YOURSELF, THERE IS MANY ALLIANCES LEFT OUT THERE TO BLOCK WITH!" :salute:

Re: Second half of the round
 

I suppose it was ok when Ult blocked with 3-4 other alliances last round.

Re: Second half of the round
 

There's nothing wrong with lesser alliances teaming up to fight a superior foe :cool:

Re: Second half of the round
 

Lets be honest here. Asc has been doing its own thing all round without incs. They know they'll get hit eventually so they're trying to find some friends first. Cant blame them for that.

And the blocks this round have been CT/BF/Bows vs ND/rogue/Ult.

Noones fighting alone and lets not pretend anyone is.:salute:

Re: Second half of the round
 

Rogues fought p3ng alone

Re: Second half of the round
 

Not sure if your trying to troll or your actually that stupid.

Either way my "prediction" is if asc dont get raped by ults side of the block they'll win. Im curious as to how they'll do against semi decent incs.

Re: Second half of the round
 

For once BB is right and you are being that stupid. Rogues have not been part of any block. We had a nap to Ult sure, but we haven't hit any of the opposing block members post tick 300 - except for Rainbows one night when we tried to fc some of their planets hitting one of our members.

Rogues and P3ng have been hitting each other for the past 2-300 ticks. I'm sure P3ng would second that happily

Re: Second half of the round
 

P3ng have been gal raiding and hitting one or two rogues a night. Rogues def was terrible and we regularly landed their planets.

They had to ptarget us to hold us back we are too strong this round.

Re: Second half of the round
 

This is true :devil:

Re: Second half of the round
 

I think it depends on the interpersonal relationships between the HCs of the top four alliances. I suspect if it's still close between the top four near the end (I think it will be), that either ult or asc will give the other one a leg up for the victory.

Re: Second half of the round
 

haha

Re: Second half of the round
 

On 8 of the last 14 nights, Rogues has hit CT just fine...

Re: Second half of the round
 

Then again, CT claims they are being hit by an alliance if there's a galraid that has 2-3 waves on 2 ct planets.. :rolleyes:

Re: Second half of the round
 

Rogues has been hitting 2:1 repeatedly, must be that one p3nguin planet they are after...?

Also, we have had regular incoming from Faceless, Ascendancy and HR, gal raids, which no one has complained about to my knowledge.

Not that I am complaining about incoming from Rogues, it was more a comment aimed at Kryptons statement, hence the quote.

Re: Second half of the round
 

Yes yes big block vs ct pasta hitting too?

Re: Second half of the round
 

I can not remember to have said anything at all about a block hitting CT, I made a simple comment to correct an inaccurate statement.

Re: Second half of the round
 

Fiery please stop hitting Villeh!

Re: Second half of the round
 

We have had 2:1 on the raid once, the rest are retals. It's not our fault if that gals CT's members keep attacking our planets

Re: Second half of the round
 

oh and that was 3 nights ago, when we had a 24h cf with p3ng. Should probably check kia to confirm. You'd know when we've hit you. So wp Villeh

Re: Second half of the round
 

lol Krypton, you're turning into BloodyButcher's twin.

Re: Second half of the round
 

Enlighten us

Re: Second half of the round
 

I'll post instead of Villeh.
Apparently CT is being blocked by Asc, Rogues, Rainbows, PASTA, CT itself, Ultores, BF.

Did I forget someone Villeh?

Re: Second half of the round
 

Ah yes also Faceless and HR

All of those alliances hit a CT planet with at least a fleet in the last week!

This aggression has to stop!

Re: Second half of the round
 

Ct has 0 incs, but thats ok.