Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

I don't need PA mails when I report my own incs.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

When searching for ships in alliance "Free anti XX to x:x"

If some of the ships you find are in an alliance slot, can it somehow be marked with a * ?

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Expert quest: "Get 5000 roids"

Change to: "Gain 5000 roids" (over the entire round, not all at the same time)

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

In ingames attacks, for users without access to modify the attacks, there is a "edit button", nothing happends when you click it. pretty frustrating :p
Remove it for those withoout access?

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

I'd like it if the History > Covert Ops > Warp Core Sabotage statistics listed value, not number of ships.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

And while we are at Covert Ops, can we have history of past operations visible on Covert Ops page? It's a pain to jump everytime over to History, since I hardly remember coords.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

On the scans page, with the text only skin, if someone blocks your scan, the page scrolls past the message that you failed.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Intel ally page could show number of roids of each planet when filtering alliances.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

In the first tick after the shuffle, on Universe -> Galaxies the '5 galaxies around your galaxy' listing is not updated. It shows the top 5 galaxies, even though my galaxy is not top 5. This is the first time I notice it, and also happens to be the first time I get shuffled into the same X and Y coordinates as before the shuffle. Might have something to do with it?

In addition, only pre-shuffle galaxies are shown on the universe page in the tick after the shuffle.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Military quest. Construct 1 Light Factory. Should be construct 1 Factory, not every strategy requires fi/co

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

I think it might actually already trigger on any factory. Not sure, though.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

But says light, so needs to be sorted regardless

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

When a scan request is deleted, send a mail to the requester.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

is it possible to get on ally def page some way to see if a returning fleet is landing on a incoming fleet (FCd) without having to keep going back and forth between pages?

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

To watch the complete "defence/attack point list" requiers "Member Status Add, Update & Kick" access.
Why?
It should be linked to "Defence View/Update All Calls & Points & Delete Calls" instead.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

no!

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Why can't we get in the news scan if a "Incoming" notice is hostile or friendly?
Is it part of the fun to check manually each coord? :p

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

'Warfrigate' is not a word.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

When requesting scans ingame, can the game please remember the last distorters the co-ords got blocked by?

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

War bonus are just one-sided?
:salute:

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

I'd like it if fleets in JGPs were sorted by coords (within fleet type, ie, sort defense fleets by coords, then attack fleets by coords). Alternative, add those nice sorting headers that other places have (though obviously don't change the &inc=1 format that bots read).

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

In defence page when someone got incs , you should have a button who can place all current def to that planet into a bcalc with one little push.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Since this is wishes....

#1 Mil Scans Back!
#2 New Covert Opp: Cut Fleet Communications. (This covert op would cut contact with someones already flying fleet so recall messages cannot be received)

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

I'd like to remind everyone that this is nagging over tiny things.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Havoc is set so quickly after the round is over, there's barely any chance to get data about the round before its lost. :(

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

I agree, what makes PA great is the amount of countries represented in the player base, my time zone means I am still at work when the game ends and you have the EORC (good thing I never win). But I would like to be able to look at the system and review information in alliance before all of a sudden all that is gone. (I dont even know by contributing score where I fell in the alliance)

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Havoc existing is worse. It takes up 10 weeks of the year that could be used for another round. It's played by 30 ppl max. Waste of resources

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Those with lots of free time who don't need to take a break in between rounds play, those who likes to have 2 weeks off for RL enjoy it too. I know some players who almost play round solely to play havoc at the end with their gal mates. Nothing wrong with havoc existing.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Any way there would be a possibility to have an option to "archieve" mails sent out by alliance HCs?
Now you have the option to send to diffrent users groups, "all hcs", "all members", and so forth, but id love a option where i could automaticly archieve a mail so if people forget the info given in the mail, they could just go to the allie "mail archieve" and re-read it.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Maybe that "mail archieve" should be called a forum?

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Yeah, ive considered doing that, sounds like a lot of work, im lazy.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

That's silly. Unit scans can never be blocked. Same for landing scans.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Can scan links automaticly be tagged with the scan thing, to make em clickable?
If on phone, its easier to just paste things instead of writing additional text, and i dont see why i would have to since the links are allready from http://game.planetarion.com/showscan.pl...

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

You mean if you paste a link into a PA mail, it's automatically converted to a [scan]id[/scan]-like thing?

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

yes

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

That then brings me to the following: the [scan] format makes fairly crappy links. "Scan-link" could be anything, and the link itself (on platforms where hovering works) says nothing about what the scan is of. It'd be nice if it said something like "A 1:2:3 pt456" or "P 7:8:9 pt1011".

And while we're at it, it'd be nice if [scan]https://game.planetarion.com/showscan.pl?scan_id=7astlcqgd3ni6s9[/scan] also worked. Saves some editing.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

You don't need to write additional text..
Try looking harder at a scan; at the top it has "Scan Link" which is a link; right below it it has [scan]....[/scan] - so instead of copying the scan link copy the [scan]...[/scan] text and paste that..

(Nothing against making the link clickable tho)

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

A text box for comments for in the ally fleets page for each ally fleet could be very useful in two cases:
- saying which ships can be faked with that fleet
- saying that fleet shouldn't be used as planet ended up needing them at home

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

What about cluster/parallel alliances again in havoc? Was more fun IMHO

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

I really wish the order box on the Production page had the 0 aligned to the left, as it is on most other pages. Clicking on it while on mobile and having to move the cursor to the other side of the 0 is so incredibly mildly irritating!