New City
 

If you could only live in one city what would it be?

It cant be a city that you've lived in for more than a year.

Personally i'd live in Belfast 'cause i suspect it's just like Glasgow (only smaller and Irish).

Re: New City
 

london dear

our future matrimonial home

Re: New City
 

You live in London as such its not a NEW CITY!

Re: New City
 

either miami or anywhere at the beach of cancun. i need sun and in Vienna (where i live now) i get sun like 4 months each year.

Re: New City
 

New York (perhaps).

In all honesty, I prefer the great outdoors.

Re: New City
 

I haven't travelled enough to know, really.

Re: New City
 

within england... manchester, i get around your rule as i only lived there for 6 months and i loved it

failing that edinburgh, without a doubt

Re: New City
 

i couldn't stand to live in a city

Re: New City
 

Edinburgh RR?

****ing hell dude.

I'm dissapointed in you.

Re: New City
 

visiting a city is completely different to living there...
I really like Ljubljana when I visited but I have no idea whether I'd want to live there...

In short - I don't know.

Re: New City
 

london or NY.

Re: New City
 

New York

or


London


nowhere else really. (citywise)

Re: New City
 

Rome

I ****ing love the place. Naples comes a close second, but thats only because Neapolitans are absoloutely ****ing bonkers.

Re: New City
 

Pau, France.
________
INFANTS NEXIUM

Re: New City
 

i ahdnt remmeber rome


actually New York, London or Rome..

rome was absolutely ****ing beautiful and the women....omg the women......'speechless' is the only way to describe them.

EVERYONE has style
EVERYONE knows how to carry themselves

did i mention the women?

plus the city itself is truly beautiful. the architecture is phenomnal. The piazzas are wonderful (esp the navrona one with some rather nice restaurants all around it)

AND theres a lovely little coffee place near the pantheon.


actually Rome would be teh first choice (presuming i could learn italian) then NY then London.

Re: New City
 

heh i thought about naples aswell, then didn't choose it for the same reason.

Re: New City
 

Rome for the following reasons

• It has history
• It has atmosphere
• Its people dont give a shit about tourists
• Its people dont give a shit about each other
• It has decent public transport, even if it is filled with beggars
• It has a police force more concerned with chatting up blondes than dishing out speeding fines
• Its got everything London has, but the Beer doesnt cost £10 a pint.

Re: New City
 

kura is my hero <3 <3

Re: New City
 

Florence

i plan doing a tour by car this summer via munich, milan and florence to rome btw, should be fun. :)

Re: New City
 

Glasgow, i hear it has dace.


<3

Re: New City
 

Monaco

~Vaio~

Re: New City
 

Bordeaux.

Re: New City
 

Dublin, that accent turns me on so much.

Re: New City
 

toronto.

Re: New City
 

Rome or London. Nothing else will do.

Re: New City
 

you fancy girls with moustaches.

Re: New City
 

Are you taking the piss?
Naples is pretty much a massive dump, so much so that Italians insult each other by saying you're from Naples. Koes is right about Florence, that place has a lot of plusses going for it, and yes, of course so does Rome.

As for where I'd like to live, I really don't know and don't want to 'pigeon hole' myself.

Re: New City
 

Kyoto.

Re: New City
 

paris

Re: New City
 

London or Melbourne

Re: New City
 

Sometimes, what makes a city is its people, not the surroundings they live in.

For this , Naples probably comes above almost every other city in Europe.

Re: New City
 

Making sweeping statements about large groups of people is bad, mmkay?

Also, they don't seem that great to me.

(Yes I realise the irony if what I've done here).

Re: New City
 

NYC or Sydney.

Re: New City
 

Somewhere in the Far East like Hong Kong or Tokyo.

Re: New City
 

I'd go for the Black Forest. I'd hate to live in a city.

Re: New City
 

I have no idea. Prague perhaps. San Francisco for the weird streets.

Re: New City
 

San Francisco or NY.

I've visited Italy a few times and didn't find it particularly awe inspiring.

Re: New City
 

whats wrong with edinburgh dace? i have about 10 friends who live up there now and they all say its the best place that they have ever lived

Re: New City
 

they're lying

Re: New City
 

Salt and sauce. That's what's wrong with Edinburgh.

Re: New City
 

Maspalomas, Spain

I was going to say Amsterdam, but the weather sucks.

Re: New City
 

--valletta, malta--

the night life is A W E S O M E ! the girls are BEAUTIFUL beyond words can express, they're young, naked on the beaches drunk and they're catholics - interesting history, and the food is great! and it's right in the middle where flying anywhere in europe for a holiday is not very astronomical (like when flying from the US)

Re: New City
 

i paid $50 for a dark blue shirt with the light blue 'cross' flag thingy and a very light blue 'edinburgh' across the chest - and almost got beaten to death by a bunch of pissed off scots in tie's and blazers

dunfermline is probably the best town/city place in scotland - i think - (can't remember what constitutes a 'city' or a 'town' in scotland - it has something to do with whoever's got a cathedral or something like that, dont remember)

Re: New City
 

Tikrit

Re: New City
 

Norway.. every girl there looks like a supermodel +++

Re: New City
 

new york

it looks like a good craic

Re: New City
 

Jalalabad or Tora-Bora.

sounds nice and tropical.

Re: New City
 

come on koen, you know you love london...

admit it!

Re: New City
 

*admit*

woulnd't mind living there for some time tbh, i like that city. even tried to find a place to work there for my training period this year. then my lector recommended me not to go. :(
so now i'm sat on some dutch island.

Re: New City
 

Rome or New York.