Planetarion Forums

Planetarion Forums (https://pirate.planetarion.com/index.php)
-   General Discussions (https://pirate.planetarion.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Ste, Dace... (https://pirate.planetarion.com/showthread.php?t=191110)

pig 31 May 2006 01:16

Ste, Dace...
 
Finally a political party has been created for you

here

Dace 31 May 2006 01:24

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
HOLLAND HERE I COME!

Dace 31 May 2006 01:25

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
errrr, i mean cum

pig 31 May 2006 01:28

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Could such a party exist in the UK do you think?

Also what they are saying "A ban just makes children curious," do you think thats correct i mean do kids at 12 really want sex are do paedos just want a reason to sleep with young boys (and girls, maybe dead people too)

Dace 31 May 2006 01:31

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
I think they would end up killed (which i think is very, very wrong) because there's too many people out there who don't believe in democracy *sobs*

BlacK_Bengudo 31 May 2006 01:34

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
the bizarre political party
:(

JammyJim 31 May 2006 02:26

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_A...ve_Association

acropolis 31 May 2006 02:34

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16
meh.
Quote:

"A ban just makes children curious," Ad van den Berg, one of the party's founders, told the Algemeen Dagblad (AD) newspaper.
"In fact, one of my biggest pickup lines is 'you wanna find out why it's illegal?'"
Quote:

"They make out as if they want more rights for children. But their position that children should be allowed sexual contact from age 12 is of course just in their own interest," anti-pedophile campaigner Ireen van Engelen told the AD daily.
OH SHIT! THEY'RE ONTO US!
Quote:

The party wants private possession of child pornography to be allowed although it supports the ban on the trade of such materials.
that seems odd.
Quote:

It also supports allowing pornography to be broadcast on daytime television, with only violent pornography limited to the late evening.
why can't these perverts understand that sex is a shameful act that needs to be hidden?
Quote:

Toddlers should be given sex education and youths aged 16 and up should be allowed to appear in pornographic films and prostitute themselves.
this is actually a pretty minor shift for holland, isn't it?
Quote:

Sex with animals should be allowed although abuse of animals should remain illegal, the NVD said.
it is odd that you can murder an animal, but you aren't allowed to consummate a loving relationship with one...
Quote:

The party also said everybody should be allowed to go naked in public
i have to say that some people shouldn't be allowed to go naked.
Quote:

and promotes legalizing all soft and hard drugs
yes; no.
Quote:

and free train travel for all.
:up:

really there is very little in there that has to do with pedophilia, outside of the incremental changes to child porn laws. really this is more just a bunch of pervs and deviants mixed up with civil libertarians.

Dante Hicks 31 May 2006 08:58

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by acropolis
yes; no.

Why the no?

KoeN 31 May 2006 09:21

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
this is one of the founders. :salute:

Ste 31 May 2006 09:22

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
I don't want to have sex with animals :confused:

roadrunner_0 31 May 2006 09:48

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
yeah, but at least we all agree on the free train travel...

KoeN 31 May 2006 11:01

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
for 5 years now, i already have free train/bus/tram/underground travel from mondaymorning to friday-evening. in weekends i have a 40% discount.

:cool:

JonnyBGood 31 May 2006 11:04

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KoeN
for 5 years now, i already have free train/bus/tram/underground travel from mondaymorning to friday-evening. in weekends i have a 40% discount.

:cool:

Only you could possibly make this thread uninteresting.

The_Tyrant 31 May 2006 11:09

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
They'd be worth a vote if they guaranteed a sexy 15 year old for every voter.

Its hardly rocket science.

furball 31 May 2006 11:16

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Tyrant
They'd be worth a vote if they guaranteed a sexy 15 year old for every voter.

Its hardly rocket science.

How about a 12 year old sir? Fresh out of white cotton panties, just a touch of hair on her minge sir. Ooh, suit you sir, do you want her sir? Plenty of hymen there for you sir, ready for the taking, sir! Ooh, suits you, sir.

Dante Hicks 31 May 2006 11:18

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KoeN
for 5 years now, i already have free train/bus/tram/underground travel from mondaymorning to friday-evening. in weekends i have a 40% discount.

Big deal, we let our spastics have free travel too.

The_Tyrant 31 May 2006 11:22

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by furball
How about a 12 year old sir? Fresh out of white cotton panties, just a touch of hair on her minge sir. Ooh, suit you sir, do you want her sir? Plenty of hymen there for you sir, ready for the taking, sir! Ooh, suits you, sir.

guessing you got a sister then? yeah, i'll make a woman of her :)

JonnyBGood 31 May 2006 11:29

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by furball
How about a 12 year old sir? Fresh out of white cotton panties, just a touch of hair on her minge sir. Ooh, suit you sir, do you want her sir? Plenty of hymen there for you sir, ready for the taking, sir! Ooh, suits you, sir.

Remember furball there's nothing wrong with anything once it's decriminalised :(

Dante Hicks 31 May 2006 12:16

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Remember furball there's nothing wrong with anything once it's decriminalised :(

I was reading in an Irish newspaper yesterday that a prisoner who had sex with a 12 year old girl is planning to appeal under the new ruling. So :up: for justice.

JonnyBGood 31 May 2006 12:27

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante Hicks
I was reading in an Irish newspaper yesterday that a prisoner who had sex with a 12 year old girl is planning to appeal under the new ruling. So :up: for justice.

He's out of jail and under double jeopardy or whatever can't be given a retrial. Also he got her drunk beforehand.

pig 31 May 2006 12:31

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
If theres grass on the wicket...

JonnyBGood 31 May 2006 12:40

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pig
If theres grass on the wicket...

Isn't 12 statistically "early" though?

Dante Hicks 31 May 2006 12:43

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Isn't 12 statistically "early" though?

Obligatory Dace link.

JonnyBGood 31 May 2006 12:47

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante Hicks

I meant that if we're going by the philosophy of "if there's grass on the wicket..." 12 is going to be too early even for this approach.

Ste 31 May 2006 12:48

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
a lovely text I had from Tomkat about 6 months ago:
"old enough to bleed, old enough to rape ;("

nice.

JonnyBGood 31 May 2006 12:51

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Yeah but tomkat got cancer so what does that tell us about paedophiles?

Marilyn Manson 31 May 2006 13:11

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Strangely enough, I was just reading Xenophon's symposium the other day.

Quote:

"A ban just makes children curious," Ad van den Berg, one of the party's founders, told the Algemeen Dagblad (AD) newspaper.
THEY'RE ALL ****ING PRICK-TEASERS!

G.K Zhukov 31 May 2006 14:49

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Yeah but tomkat got cancer so what does that tell us about paedophiles?

Half of GD is about to develop cancer in the near future?

acropolis 31 May 2006 15:19

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante Hicks
Why the no?

it depends on what you define as hard drugs. for me:
1. Any drug that automatically makes the user a danger to (himself and) others (while under the influence).
or
2. Any drug that is addictive enough that any user will be willing to endanger (himself and) others in order to guarantee continued use.

in my utopia, drugs that fall into only the first category would be legalized for use only in controlled circumstances. the second category is tougher.

i think my definition of 'hard drugs' then makes my opposition self-explanatory.

acropolis 31 May 2006 15:21

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Isn't 12 statistically "early" though?

women 'develop' earlier than men.

which clearly means the legal age for women should be younger too.

JonnyBGood 31 May 2006 15:23

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by acropolis
women 'develop' earlier than men.

which clearly means the legal age for women should be younger too.

But what about the legal age for transsexuals!


PS You don't seem to be clear on your addiction distinction concerning hard drugs if you consider the compulsion behind certain psychological addictions.

Dante Hicks 31 May 2006 15:24

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by acropolis
it depends on what you define as hard drugs. for me:
1. Any drug that automatically makes the user a danger to (himself and) others (while under the influence).
or
2. Any drug that is addictive enough that any user will be willing to endanger (himself and) others in order to guarantee continued use.

Alcohol and cigarettes. :(

acropolis 31 May 2006 15:29

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
But what about the legal age for transsexuals!

the legal age for hermaphrodites would be found by using the ratio of the measured weights of the relevant genitalia at hand, and applying that to a simple linear function connecting the age for men and women (i realize transsexuals aren't hermaphrodites, but i think this fills out the picture better than "depends.")

JonnyBGood 31 May 2006 15:31

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by acropolis
the legal age for hermaphrodites would be found by using the ratio of the measured weights of the relevant genitalia at hand, and applying that to a simple linear function connecting the age for men and women (i realize transsexuals aren't hermaphrodites, but i think this fills out the picture better than "depends.")

Shouldn't we invent some sort of arbitrary maturity test which basically rewards people for having watched stupid amounts of Byker Grove?

acropolis 31 May 2006 15:33

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante Hicks
Alcohol and cigarettes. :(

'immediate physical threat' or whatever shit the lawyers come up with that prevents police from throwing everyone in the McDonalds drive through lane into a psyche ward on account o' them being 'a danger to themselves'

I'm sure I'll have a full legal department that can handle the pissy details when I'm king.

acropolis 31 May 2006 15:35

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Shouldn't we invent some sort of arbitrary maturity test which basically rewards people for having watched stupid amounts of Byker Grove?

how would that give me an excuse to fondle people's naughty parts?

JonnyBGood 31 May 2006 15:36

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by acropolis
how would that give me an excuse to fondle people's naughty parts?

Kings are above the law dear.

acropolis 31 May 2006 15:39

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Kings are above the law dear.

a little bit of Droit du seigneur never hurt nobody, at least that's what my pappy always used to say (then he'd **** a 12 year-old virgin serf girl* while she cried.).


*inserted to make the post topical.

Marilyn Manson 31 May 2006 16:07

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KoeN
for 5 years now, i already have free train/bus/tram/underground travel from mondaymorning to friday-evening. in weekends i have a 40% discount.

:cool:

You post like old people ****.

Dante Hicks 31 May 2006 20:55

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by acropolis
'immediate physical threat' or whatever shit the lawyers come up with that prevents police from throwing everyone in the McDonalds drive through lane into a psyche ward on account o' them being 'a danger to themselves'

Fair enough. I presume you're against suicide then too?

acropolis 31 May 2006 21:57

Re: Ste, Dace...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante Hicks
Fair enough. I presume you're against suicide then too?

i tried to make my definition effective both in societies with legal suicide and those without (just drop the parenthetical sections) because i wanted to avoid this argument.

but yeah, does it show so easily? i'm completely in favor of euthanasia, and i'm completely open on the subject, but really this has to be one of the 'Top 5 Ways To **** Up Your Kid'.

of course enforcing the criminalization of suicide is an inherently laughable concept, but i do the best i can to disrespect them as much as possible.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018