Ste, Dace...
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
HOLLAND HERE I COME!
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
errrr, i mean cum
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Could such a party exist in the UK do you think?
Also what they are saying "A ban just makes children curious," do you think thats correct i mean do kids at 12 really want sex are do paedos just want a reason to sleep with young boys (and girls, maybe dead people too) |
Re: Ste, Dace...
I think they would end up killed (which i think is very, very wrong) because there's too many people out there who don't believe in democracy *sobs*
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
the bizarre political party
:( |
Re: Ste, Dace...
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
really there is very little in there that has to do with pedophilia, outside of the incremental changes to child porn laws. really this is more just a bunch of pervs and deviants mixed up with civil libertarians. |
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
I don't want to have sex with animals :confused:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
yeah, but at least we all agree on the free train travel...
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
for 5 years now, i already have free train/bus/tram/underground travel from mondaymorning to friday-evening. in weekends i have a 40% discount.
:cool: |
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
They'd be worth a vote if they guaranteed a sexy 15 year old for every voter.
Its hardly rocket science. |
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
If theres grass on the wicket...
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
a lovely text I had from Tomkat about 6 months ago:
"old enough to bleed, old enough to rape ;(" nice. |
Re: Ste, Dace...
Yeah but tomkat got cancer so what does that tell us about paedophiles?
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Strangely enough, I was just reading Xenophon's symposium the other day.
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
1. Any drug that automatically makes the user a danger to (himself and) others (while under the influence). or 2. Any drug that is addictive enough that any user will be willing to endanger (himself and) others in order to guarantee continued use. in my utopia, drugs that fall into only the first category would be legalized for use only in controlled circumstances. the second category is tougher. i think my definition of 'hard drugs' then makes my opposition self-explanatory. |
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
which clearly means the legal age for women should be younger too. |
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
PS You don't seem to be clear on your addiction distinction concerning hard drugs if you consider the compulsion behind certain psychological addictions. |
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
I'm sure I'll have a full legal department that can handle the pissy details when I'm king. |
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
*inserted to make the post topical. |
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
but yeah, does it show so easily? i'm completely in favor of euthanasia, and i'm completely open on the subject, but really this has to be one of the 'Top 5 Ways To **** Up Your Kid'. of course enforcing the criminalization of suicide is an inherently laughable concept, but i do the best i can to disrespect them as much as possible. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:56. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018