Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

add vacation to bot files.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

^Remove vacation mode

Hiding a fleet is now an option.
I dont think anyone uses vacation mode when they actually go on holiday....

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Is there any reason we can't transfer ships to a pre-launched fleet?

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

When prelaunched, its by definition (ish) not on your planet, it is launched.

You can ofcourse just cancel the prelaunch, move ships into it and prelaunch again.

It is also safe from covops etc when prelaunched

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

On the History -> Cov ops page, the metric is ships stolen. Value stolen would be better.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Right, but not having to launch again would be less hassle, and I don't see any gameplay reason to not allow moving ships to/from prelaunched fleets.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

The ETA of your fleet can change?
i.e. if you PL a FI fleet with 1+8 (i.e. eta 9) and then you add FR/DE ship it suddenty needs to launch at the tick instead of next tick..
Or if you PL a FI fleet with 1+8 (i.e. eta 9) and then you add a CR/BS ship it suddently should have launched already?

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

^Remove meta travel times.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

When the PA window is too narrow to display the entire right side of the page, a horizontal scroll bar is shown. When you scroll to the right, the page on the right slides under the menu.

That's all OK, but the menu has a transparant background, making it hard to read:

https://i.imgur.com/SCkSHfE.png

Text-only skin.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

That's valid. I'd still love to be able to transfer ships without having to recall and resend when possible though.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

When you select a lot of messages to delete, the page takes forever to reload. I suspect that each message is deleted in an individual query to the database, and that this is making things very slow. It should be possible to optimize this.

Full disclosure: when I say "when you select a lot of messages to delete", I mean "the one time I selected a lot of messages to delete". I've only done it once, so we may be looking at an anomaly. However, I can rule out the interference by the mid-tick backup, this took place at xx:28.

Sidenote, god how I hate the midtick backup. I get that it's important and I'm not suggesting you remove it, but. :(

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

On the ship selling page, I'd expect the prices listed to be what I get for selling them, not their production cost.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

"so many" people are crashing but 0 people have reported this in support explicitly. This is the first I've heard of it. We added this because we had users who were clicking back and their browser re-loaded the page and resent fleet orders, which caused user complaints, which meant we added this. You're now complaining the opposite is also causing problems, so I can't see an ideal solution for this.


Sorry, what do you mean? Is this not a browser issue where you click back and a page says it expired because you already submitted something for it (i.e. it's trying to stop the issue I mentioned in my above reply to gm)?

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Invalid action request. This could be a result of your request having expired, double submitting the form or hitting back in your browser and resubmitting an old page/form

the changes were made because someone was exploiting the page wasnt it?? cant you just fix the code so when you reload a page it doesn't resend to the database and then give us a page that functions for recalling fleets.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

I do notice at xx:30 all game page can take an extra 10 seconds to load, is there a ticker at this time?

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

That's the midtick backup. Database has to be frozen while it runs.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

It'd be nice if multiple identical scan requests were grouped together:

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

You can send alliance mails to selected access groups. You can also mail just HCs. The latter function is a subset of the former.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Make it possible to mark all fleets on a wave covered with one click.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Move/duplicate the cov-op history in the cov-op page, same way as waves does today (so I can see my earlier cov-op targets in the relevant page).

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

On the universe page, when - for example - sorting by size, I don't get the top 100 planets in size, but rather top 100 score planets ordered by size.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Alliance scanners should not be shown scan requests if they cannot fulfill them because they lack the scan in question, or don't have enough amps.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Alliance intel should show on every screen on every screen/scan when you highlight coordinates, instead of you having to go to alliance pages to see it. If you've got intel you should be able to see it everywhere.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

When I do an incoming scan on my own planet, I'd like to be able to see returning fleets.

I think this may be the tiniest nag I've come up with so far.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

HCT research is numbered sequentially. Change the numbers to coincide with number of roids each research allows you to mine: HCT200, HCT300, etc.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

When you have alot of incomings, the alliance def page loads annoyingly slowly.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Timestamps in my news please.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Yeah. Integrate galaxy and alliance screen, and if you set trusted, galaxy screen should have the same functionality as the alliance one. It's just confusing having to shift between the two because i can see more on the alliance one.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

And intel on scans.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Get rid off those "confirm" check boxes on the fleets page. They make recalling fleets near impossible on a phone since their tinyness makes them hard to select, and on some skins it's near impossible to see when they are even checked.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Merge the universe combat report and news combat reports into 1 view containing all the information from both, then use it in both places. From universe combat reports I want the total salvage and to be able to see the impact on individual fleets. From news combat reports I want values.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

On the alliance page, the 'View' in 'View Alliance Ships' and 'View Alliance Log' is unncessary and overflows into a third line of 'tabs'.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Did someone already mention the annoying inconsistency between alliance defense page and galaxy status when it comes to marking ship classes and setting status of incoming hostile fleets?

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Yeah, a few posts ago.

Apply the advanced scan interface to scan requests as well - at present, I can perform multiple scans all at once, but if I want to ask a scanner to do so I have to request them one by one.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

On the fleets page it would be great if you could click on ETA / Target / Ships ect... and see from top number of ships sent / how many people have sent to what targ ect

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

put land tick as well as launch tick on the prelaunch boxs..

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Loading the history page (the ingame one) takes a very long time.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

On gal status and the ally defence page there is a Fake option. It is however unclear whether this means its a fake attack or a fake defence which means there is inconsistent usage; confusing!

So could we have both options on the drop down; 'Fake Attack' and 'Fake Defence'

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

Add the ability to add nicks / comments under fleets in the bcalc.

Re: Nagging over tiny things thread #2
 

In the main menu on the left, replace 'waves' by 'scans' as it's how they're called everywhere else (including on ally page).