Stats Xmas round 2017
It dawned on me that this round is fast approaching its end and that we'll have our tradional xmas round and we need stats for it.
I made a basic layout without AC/DC/EMP in it to show where i see the xmas set heading. As mentioned in the past, we'll be doing an all ETD set for this xmas round. You can see the stats here. Bcalc available here. Any ideas, suggestions, comments welcome. I'll probably finish the set this comming weekend with AC/DC/EMP and process any useful feedback into it unless someone comes up with a better proposal. |
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Is this based on current race stats? Research bonus etc?
|
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
looks decent will be interested to see AC DC and EMP.
|
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
They look fairly balanced at first glance, though all 3 races can build their 4 attack ships to cover all the bases. Whether the off class ships are worth building (for most planets) will depend on their effs.
Will the new quests be available as well? |
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Great question. Will we see the general setup of quests or sonething different?
|
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
EMP has been set
AC DC has been set Costs have been set To do: Decide what to do with base eta Look at racial bonuses Waiting for appoco to upload them to xmas server to do final review Any feedback in the meantime is always welcome |
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
There's only one good decision to make with the base ETA thing: whichever you assumed when you made the stats is the option that should be picked.
|
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Roll with it.
|
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
|
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Thanks for not tampering with Base Eta in a galwar round.
I'm against it in regular rounds aswell, but thats another story. Rather see mz's suggestion about inverted tech order on hulls. |
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Quote:
I was pondering about making the base eta's rather similar since fi co and cr bs target eachother. that way nobody really has an eta advantage but the mz thing does sound interesting too, could try that in xmas round too. Thanks for giving me something to ponder :) |
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Ok stats are done as far as i'm concerned. If you point out a valid issue with the set, i'll consider making some minor updates to the set.
Only thing left to decide is racial bonuses |
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Not sure what the point is of the weird base eta pods. Please explain...
|
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
You encourage gal politics and defense abuse with this set.
Some alliances (not galaxies) will abuse this way more than others. So overall :down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::dow n::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::d own::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down::down: :down::down: |
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Quote:
curerntly you reward the first research with the fastest eta and the slowest with the highest. to balance fico crbs better the suggestion was made that maybe those eta's should be reversed thought it a nice experiment for this xmas round :) same with the etd style set |
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Quote:
|
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
I suggested either inverting the tech tree or invert metaclass ETAs. The effects are completely identical.
I didn't have in mind what Jintao has done with the stats, but it looks alright to me. |
Re: Stats Xmas round 2017
Is no else concerned with the fact that half of these ships have unpronounceable names? I feel like I need more education to play this Xmas round. :P
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018