R65 Inc stats
 

The following is based on data about fleet launches provided by the PA team.


There is a difference in the data displayed below and the data on history page, in the stats below:

• alliance = alliance at launch time
• only fleets counted which landed on or before the final tick

In the output below:

• the rows represent the number of incs an alliance received
• the columns represent the number of hostile fleets an alliance launched

This has also been posted on pastebin: http://pastebin.com/raw/3asjTb3c



alliance at launch time, fleets landing during the round


Full round: Day 0 - 49: 1 - 1177: 1177 ticks
Top 10 hostile days:

Most hostile fleets from:
Incs per day:

Most hostile fleets to:



Incs to top 10 planets

Incs to top 5 galaxies



Stats for the first half of the round: Day 0 - 25: 1 - 604: 604 ticks

Stats for the second half of the round: Day 26 - 49: 605 - 1177: 573 ticks

If anyone wants these stats for a particular tick period then feel free to PM me..

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Very interesting - Thanks for that Bram

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

I'm blown away by the amount of incoming Ultores got:

That's a merger of 3 top 10s: absolute incs, incs/member and incs/member/tick.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Im blown away that they arnt further down the rankings, i knew the incs was more or less gonna be huge.
The PA crew seriously need to reconsider the tag limit + scoring, unless, like Krypton/RexDrax what has been fronting, this round will become representative of PA.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Erm, What?

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

All credit to ult, amazing stats.

P3n's on the other hand were unusually dire - even beaten on attacks.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

p3ng has actualy been stepping it up in many parts of the game.
More attack fleets, less incomming fleets, bigger block, and not to be forgotten, having the stats god being ex p3ng.
If they keep this up they might win a round within the next 10-20 rounds.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Ultores was amazing. Fl, P3ng and CT played more or less at the same level. Tht disparity worked against Ult.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

I think some appreciation should also be given to the fact that Ult had the highest percentage of inc recalled as well, 65%. :)

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Care to elaborate?

I guess people will pick parts of these stats and use them for whatever agenda they have.

Imo you had 4 alliances in with a shout on the final day, loads of reason to stay active till the final ticks for the majority of players and genuine excitement at the end. I can't see any reason to ever raise the tag limit again.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Also how did 4:8:8 only get 6 incs and not win?

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

My agenda is that the best alliances arnt ranked #1-2-3
If it wasnt FL losing too this "loser" strategy i would make a lot noise about it.
Krypton/RexDrax is trying to make this what PA will look like every round, and should be reported/banned by every user in here wich cares for PA.
There is something rotting in PA, and id say wich "group" was the next victim, but id rather not.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

No come on, cards on the table time.

If the best alliances were ranked 1-2-3 then no one except Ult would win and that would be boring now wouldn't it.

Instead of hinting at some large conspiracy and calling for bans to people who purely voice an opinion (rarely might I add) how about you actually say everything you want to, inform us all in detail of this big evil that threatens the very structure of the game. We the masses need to be let in on this secret that you have gleamed info on.

If you can't do this maybe it's time you gave up crowing on about things you have no facts to back up. Nearly everybody in this game wants what is best for it and although other people's opinions may differ on how to do that I believe we all appreciate everyone else's intentions are pure.

You on the other hand I don't get that feeling about. You seem hell bent on taking the game back to pre PAX even tho the memberbase is nowhere big enough to play in that environment anymore. Sometimes it's good to understand that not every idea you have is what is best for the game and although we appreciate that you have ideas we don't need them rammed down our throats in the face of mounting contradictory logic.


TL;DR. Spill the beans or cease posting, we're bored of teasers now

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Cause Norse also had #1 planet. Who had more roids for a longer period of time.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

P3nguins usually gets top fleet attacking activity and has won 2 rounds back to back previously. Hence why booji was shocked. Just to give you a usual history lesson as your blatant bias toward p3nguins is rather annoying (during those 2 wins we also had most incoming for anyone that cares)

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

I have a question on the alliance stats (on beta rather than bram's):
I have always assumed that 'Alliance defence' and 'Galaxy defence' is the number of defence fleets received from other planets in that alliance and from in galaxy. Is this the case? Presumably then 'Total defence' then is like 'total attacks' the number that alliance sent out.

If it is then I dont understand some of the stats: How can Ult have 4,025 alliance defence and only 3,531 total defence? Does total defence not include defences sent ingalaxy? If so why as at first glance it does not make much sense to do this!

N.B. just mentioning ult as theirs are most out of sync. Astatores are out of sync the other way around but this seems much more understandable as it simply means they sent a lot of defence to their allies or ingal. My comprehension problem is with how ult def fleets can disappear!

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Stop mentioning my name, seriously. I dont talk to you and i wont talk to you.

The assumption you know everything, that you are so blindsided by hate and stupidity is astounding.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

I think that question was asked before but can't easily find the answer to it..

Using data I got and:

• alliance = alliance the planet was in at end of round
• all fleets included - even those landing after round end

results in the following numbers for Ultores:

• Total defence fleets launched by Ultores: 4587
  • Def fleets to Ultores planets: 3983
  • Def fleets to another alliance: 604
• Total defence fleets received by Ultores: 5915
  • Def fleets from Ultores planets: 3983
  • Def fleets from another alliance: 1932
• Total galaxy defence fleets launched by Ultores: 1336
  • Def fleets to Ultores planets: 882
  • Def fleets to another alliance: 454
• Total galaxy defence fleets received by Ultores: 1891
  • Def fleets from Ultores planets: 882
  • Def fleets from another alliance: 1099
• Total non galaxy defence fleets launched by Ultores: 3251
  • Def fleets to Ultores planets: 3101
  • Def fleets to another alliance: 150
• Total non galaxy defence fleets received by Ultores: 4024
  • Def fleets from Ultores planets: 3101
  • Def fleets from another alliance: 923

So to answer your question: the number:

• 'Alliance defence' = non galaxy defence fleets received by an alliance (ignoring who send the defence fleet)
• 'Galaxy Defence' = galaxy defence fleets received by an alliance (ignoring who send the defence fleet)
• 'Total defence' = no idea...

Full stats based on:

• alliance = alliance the planet was in when the fleet launched
• only fleets with landing tick <= 1177

NOTE: this is a different counting method so numbes above will not match numbers below !

All def fleets
Galaxy def fleets
Non galaxy def fleets

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

You walk around like an idiot that gets angry at everything. Why wouldnt he name you. It is obviously making you rage.

On topic:
Thanks for the info bram, atleast it shows we had the most incoming PRE block aswell. People always claim Ult gets a lead while no one dares to hit them. But while gal raiding we just dont let many incs land.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Unfortunately i dont rage over a game pal, like the weak minded go getters in this world do!

Naturally if he just says names for the sake of it he is to quote football "bringing the game into disrepute" and should be banned accordingly.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

So what does make you rage, you always flame and give angry comments. So if the rage does not come from the game. It clearly must come from your RL.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

It's simple tbh, not only do our block help us but we also help them. On a few occasions I personally sent def to bows (hence my poor sylph never returned :()

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Your sending defence to bows would cause the same phenomenon as Astatores has not the one ult has.

But to take your gist you are saying alliance defence includes fleets sent in by other alliances? All defence fleets sent to your alliance at higher than galaxy eta?

Thanks for the help

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

That is what matches the numbers...

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

I thank you for your interest in my life and by taking matter with something that has no relevance to you but I think it more appropriate that you take stock of your own life and how you spend your own time first.

Thanks!

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Not at all, I observe people like you as a hobby. Like one would study monkeys for scientific research. I just study idiots online.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

That sounds like a full time job. :)

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

You observe people over the internet as a hobby? Don't get me wrong I have obviously formed my own opinion of people over the years through PA based on interacting with them or reading posts on the forum but I wouldn't exactly refer to it as a 'hobby' or compare it to studying.

Surely that's a sign you might be taking it slightly to seriously after all, as this is becoming quite a job for you it appears.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Where did I ever call it PA based interaction? Maybe you should read what I am saying next time to dissect it correctly. Studying other people is actually quite usefull.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Oh I'm sorry I must of miss understood you. You clarified you were studying Krypton, or in your own words which I assume your now going to defend you said "people like you" but let's face it your comparing him to others meaning your still studying him and based on the fact I'm pretty confident you haven't met him within the realms what we like to refer to as "real life" then I think it's quite safe to assume your referring to observing people within pa? Maybe you should read your own posts and "study" your own replies before trying to then debate with me an obvious point.

And I 100% agree with you on one perticular point it is rather useful. For instance, from my experiences of dealing with you and based on other people on the receiving end of your politic tactics I've discovered you to not only be rather arrogant and patronising toward lower alliances but also threatening. Usually people who are like that within a txt based game or think they are "superior" have some type of anger management issues.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

All credit to ult to have members who would be so active in defense for such a long time, i mean those players who are ex ct, nd, p3ng etc have really put their lives on hold since quitting our alliances to be so active.

Oh by the way I was being sarcastic.

We all know that the use of teamviewer is rife in Ultores and is a requirement, each BP has a fleet controller to manage sending defense for that gal. Don't bother denying it, remember those people used to be in our alliances and some do talk!

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

how dare you gm, obviously its all skills and dedication - else the Multihunters would ofc have allready acted upon such a behavior!

Oh right, now me beeing sarcastic....

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

The fact that you think there is PA online makes me wonder. But to clarify, yes the internet is a bigger place than PA and its community. Clearly in every community there are people like you living into a bubble.
Ofcourse I am arrogant to people I think are boarderline moronic. I mean come on you read 1 sentence and dissect it so wrongly you wouldnt even have gotten passing grade in primairy school.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

What EX CT's do we have? I guess we just spamcall people awake for the show of it.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

But of course your fantastic grammar and spelling above would? I got your little comments spot on. You admitted your sad enough to observe people online. If it's within the realms of PA or not it's still rather sad. Ever tried stepping outside once and a while?

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

CT is 9 years old, most of ultores have been CT members, including you!

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

The fact that you talk about grammar from someone who isnt native english makes me wonder about your level of intelligence. One would say that speaking more than one language is pretty usefull though. However bad the grammar might be.

Maybe you are not smart enough, but when I do something I always take note of everything around me. When I talk to someone I listen and try to understand the other person. You call being observant sad, while I call it clever.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

I wonder, if your going to insult someone's intelligence or attempt to compare passing a certain school grade you would at least (native or not) attempt to not look like a 5 year old typing.

I am of course smart enough and as I've already stated I also observe people. However I don't use that as some type of acheivement or refer to it as a hobby. You compared it to how a scientist observes the behaviour of an animal. That's because they are doing it for scientific reaserch to help us benefit. You on the other hand are doing it over the Internet just to, "observe morons" as you like to put it.

Anyway we are going of topic here and quite frankly I'm getting bored of going back and forth with you. I have nothing really against Ultores as an alliance. I've admitted several times over the rounds as much as I despise certain egos within the alliance I do respect them. You on the other hand I don't respect. Take a leaf out of chimpie's book and look at a very respectful and intelligent post in the other thread. Now him I do respect and you know why? Because he doesn't think he's superior or refer to other members of the community as "moronic"

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

You still did not understand the joke. Do you really need me to explain the gravity of what I said to Krypton, so even you could understand it? But no studying morons or is not something time consuming. Nor would it be called an achievement, at the end of the day the moron is still a moron.

As for my typing, surely I make mistakes. I never claimed my english was near perfect nor do I wish it to be. Judging by the errors you make neither is yours though.

I do not wish your respect nor did I ever search for it. I have no bad feelings about you knowing I feel superior to P3nguins and your whole HC team. This is not something PA based either. I know out of experience from working with M0, yourself and munkee that the level of thinking there is poor at best. Yes I can tell that from working with people like Chimpie, who quite frankly has more intellect as you 3 together.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

I find it amusing how some of you guys resort to insults to put forward your arguments. When one uses insults in an 'intelligent' debate, it is usually a sign of low level intelligence.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

No buddy, it is not. Most likely you just miss the high level insults coming at you.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

You're.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Oh shit I missed a memo?!? Ehm wtf is team viewer? Guess I should be using it to make my gal better?
You seem to know a lot about it so maybe you could teach me sometime? Would be much appreciated cause then I can sleep and not get woken up by DCs.

Oh btw I'm not being sarcastic

Ok maybe a little

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Teamviewer is a software program that enables you to see and takeover another person's computer screen. I use it for business purposes.

You're welcome!

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

For the record, I do not think Ultores uses such software programs, because i don't see how someone can go through this much effort to come 3rd.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Ahh thank you.
But this means I would need to leave my pc on? That cost money in electricity and being a full time pa player doesn't pay that well :(

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Disgusting, and denied. If that was accurate I wouldn't be in ult.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

If teamviewer was that common in Ult, brazzies there would be using it. And I am sure they don't.

Or people really think all brazzies in Ult are joseph's accounts and didnt find it necessary to present him this tool.

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Then you will be leaving ult? :p
Ult got cheaters, not unlikely more than others.
Aint CarDinal ult?

Re: R65 Inc stats
 

Shows how out of the loop you are. CarDi got kicked before the half way point last round iirc