R73 whine thread.
So who winning?
Heard Apprime showing up with 150 cousins this round, so im supporting CarDi to #1 this round. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
ultra defensive round and already blocks and naps set up.. shamefull repeat of r70
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Unfortunately I agree. Was busy all summer so didn't have time to come with any input, so can't really complain. But this looks like one of the most boring stats sets in a long long time
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
is there any new/returning alliances playing next round apart from forests?
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Norseless
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
forest isn't playing, getting married in Jamaica
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
good move implementing those! stats are way too defensive sadly and politics, ya well....same as usual |
Re: R73 whine thread.
p3nguins won't be playing for the win. But happy to ruin others rounds. If you wish for us to be on your side and helping you to achieve a win yourself we are happy to support.
Troll all you want. The statement has been made :) Our contact details are in my sig. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Gl all, p3n, escort me!
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Ill escort you to Jamaica Forest :)
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
lol :)
think im already escorted there :) |
Re: R73 whine thread.
congrats demort, 2 tags, 100 players, and you dont hoard players??? ;p
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
you would of thought that kittenz would of drew the line at 80 players, but no ;p
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Little bit late to complain about dual tags.
Ult been doing it for a while. App also got two tags. Should give em credit for aggressive recruitment policy. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
been complaining for a while but its out of hand now, there is a difference between small support tags of 10-15 players and a hole other allaince tag
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
The tag limits been too low for years, wich has leaded to this situation. There is nothing stopping smaller allies from commiting to work together to make the odds more even, but usualy its stopped by noone willing to commit to working with another small tag. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
If one tag has a 2nd tag, the rest has to have it to compete. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
To be fair to BB, he has long being saying we need larger tags, and it is appearing now his lone voice was correct.
You just sound a bit bullying there Mzy |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
Using Kittenz and it's overspill as an example, it's a very two tiered system. The calibre of players in the overspill is lower and needs different politics and naps/allies accordingly. Although Katz will always aid Kittenz it may be possible to lock out the picture if as Kittenz rival you get your naps right. If it was 1 giant 120 person tag you couldn't do this and politics would be stale AF. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
Because at this point, and I want to stress I'm not being sarcastic for effect, but I genuinely can't see how that would work. Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
Looking at past rounds, before the tag limit cut, Ultores were around 50-70 players, so i dont think the argument that Ultores will just fill up their tag and create a new support tag is valid(even though it could happend). Many tags thats been "high caliber" on paper has usualy eaten themself up from the inside because of clashing personalties, and this is more likely to happend for bigger tags than smaller tags as the chance of having more CBA`s, or Joseph`s, or whatever in those tags. Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
So I hoard players when we actively recruit outside of pa as I've always said feel free to ask them to join you
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
I wouldnt, its just natural that players switch alliances these days, and its not like Ultores/ND/CT/etc isnt trying to recruit players from other tags aswell. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
I am obviously acting stupid and we have no support tag. :)
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
no they just have 2 tags so they can force politics
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
Well over 50% of all fleets CatZ sent last round was sent to KittenZ, more than CatZ sent to their own planets. Meanwhile, under 10% of the fleets KittenZ sent last round was sent to CatZ planets. So they happend to have 2 tags, where one is much better at defending the "sister tag" than the other. Not that i got anything specificly against this way of playing, as its what the game is enforcing upon the community with having the tag limits as low as they are today. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Oh please, tag limit is higher than your IQ already.
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
You complain about support tags when in reality the lower tag limits are the only thing keeping the game alive. Do you really think allowing agar3s access to 360 ally ETA def fleets in an active ult round would be good for the game? The +1 support tag defence keeps in check the usefulness of such a plan and if the likes of Ult or App were given access to 60 more ally spots each then they would gather up every active player going in 2-3 rounds and then just nap and chill. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
Its called the "bandwagon" effect, cba to explain it to you, as im sure its been dicussed xxxxx times allready. Also, having 40/60 planets scoring means that even with 10-20 planets in a support tag you will have MORE planets that has a crazy "1 ship build" and that dont care about crashing their fleet as long as lose some aswell. The other round i had 5 or 6 waves of incs from "Astatores", all of em "covered" wich meant the attacker to big losses, way more than defence, still they all landed cus they dont give a damn. The moronic changes to the tag limits over the 30 rounds is changing how the game is played, and its not changing it in a direction wich i think is positive. Historicly, Ultores never had a lot of players, theyve always been around the same member count they are right now, a little less actualy. And who is talking about making tag limits 120+ anyway? |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
* Topic is 'KittenZ / LionZ Public Channel Set by Avenger on Mon Aug 07 20:16:00 2017 2 tags, 1 main tag, 1 support tag |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
Nothing was said about counting/uncounting, that's a completely different kettle of fish. So all this is based on an element which has moved by 10-20 members in 30+ rounds? (Kittenz would still have Lionz with round 40 limits) Astaores style of play is no different to any other uncompeting alliance around tick 800, just because they are affiliated with Ultores does not make them different to any of the plethora of tags that have done the same since rd1. You have no clue of Ulrores memberbase, you never played there and no one in there would talk to you on a personal enough level to give that info away. If we have two tags with 60 + 50 you would alreast need a tag limit of 100-120 to stop support tags otherwise nothing would change |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
To be quite honest, we played separated most of the last round due to fang politics, which stopped us acting as a one. Until we had to leave for that particular reason. Without the obvious KittenZ relation, the merger would have been pretty nice with fangs def oriented thinking and our attack hungry people. Sadly the politics messed it up. We only deffed KittenZ the last (couple) hundred ticks, when they had a clear shot for the win, while our 20 man tag obviously didn't. Still there were a solid few finishing top 100. Prolly would have been closer to t50 without changing priorities. I don't know what supportive formation you do find from a tag full of solid teamplayers and some main figures of the alliance. We don't have minions to do dirty work for us, so I rather create our own luck. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Code:
Rank Name |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
9 Apprime 14,285 60 4,561 343,975 13,759,009 Apprime a support tag too? ;) e. and ofc its intentional. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
|
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
Illuminati works for App and FanG is full of Bows now so it will support VGN or p3n Everyone has support tag. |
Re: R73 whine thread.
Quote:
Maybe Illuminati are close with Apprime but Illuminati are there own tag and have no intention of supporting Apprime as Apprime are playing a chilled round And as for FAnG between 9 and 12 of the players are former bows and im not to sure that the whole 9 - 12 of them would have the influence politically to make decisions regarding relations. Anyway were not talking about alliances that are napped/allied or have been friendly in the past were talking about an alliance having a 2nd tag controlled by the main tag |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018