Some stuff for you to disprove
 

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicegypt.htm interesting

what say those of gd?

my fav has to the be carvings of vehicles and the one of the rocket :D

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

Didn't Egyptians used to view their gods as sharing some animal visual traits?, and at some points, weren't the pharoahs considered gods? And couldn't that be considered to be the head of a dog on a man (i.e. grey ears)?

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

"Watch less stargate".

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

Actually, now I look at it again, it does look kinda weird, them black things are just like the glasses you expect Dame Edna Everage to be wearing. Freaky.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/foetussm.jpg
Haven't read the artical, but that little chap looks like he's got a penis for a finger.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

I could think of worse places to have a penis.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

and the carvings of blantly modern craft?

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

Maybe you should ask an Egyptologist?

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

Pass, I am no expert on Egypt, I was just putting forward a plausible alternative. The thing is, I don't ever tend to read too much into these sorts of things, as they usually turn up to be a hoax or something perfectly explainable. Until I hear both sides of the story, or find out there isn't a second, I don't tend to make a decision.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

They are all ´old´ news. I can debunk all of them for you easily.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

Its fake and is therefore a load of horseshit.

There are no aliens. Get a girlfriend and get over it.

~Vaio~

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

The original carvings are turned 90º. Then they are normal symbols for man, rain, harvest and bad.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

BTW The so-called ´rocket´ existed, still exists and can be seen in Paris.

I keep laughing my ass off for people interpreting the most rotten form of drawing 3d in bloody history.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

You are wrong, and im getting married shortly :)

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

Okay I´ll go on if you will.

The features on Cydonia, Mars mentioned earliar are also open to suggestion as you can only see them with the light coming from a certain angle.

*I admit to have been waiting for the pics from that region to come in from the surveyor mission to for this opinion. A high-detail digital photo of the region shows broken hills, a pile of some rocky shit and not a single pyramid or face.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

Another thing, with the paint used by the egyptians. Would you think they would not have used grey or white to draw the creature? These colors weren´t exactly lacking in the egyptian palette.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

Yeah, to a picture of that vulcan bird off Star Trek right ?

~Vaio~

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

to a women, a real one, hair and everything

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

Your marrying Chewbacca?
________
Cannabis Seeds

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

chewbaccaaaaaaa
waoooooooooooooo
what a wookieeeeeee
waooooooooo

great song great times

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

Vulcan females are teh sex0r

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

They only shag every 6 years or something.

~Vaio~

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

:(

That's a remarkable waste of a good body, i could almost envision myself nibbling on those pointy ears and ****ing like a tribble until you said that.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

Bilbo! Bilbo!
The bravest little hobbit of them all.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

I suspect most people here believe that aliens exist somewhere, I certainly do. I remain unconvinced that they visited the ancient Egyptians though.

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

i didn't believe in aliens till i started posting on GD

Re: Some stuff for you to disprove
 

I will tell you what I think the truth.

Having a 2d/3d mixup in the artistic world, the egyptians that recorded the hieroglyphs obviously are oblivious where it comes to the bigger scales of the universe and higher geometry. Their art and what is called ´their´ buildings are mutually exclusive, period.

The inca´s were more honest as they had recorded that they had no clue what they stumbled upon in that jungle (thexcocozotal or wtf etc) but simply occupied it. They could not make the wheel but had blocks of 25 tons placed on eachother so well that you can not fit a paper in between.

Then there´s Ankor Wat wich is an exact scaled copy of the planets (size, and position) in our solar system including the eleventh one recently seen.

So, if you ask me, what did the ancient egyptians have to do with that? The same as the incas and the meso-thai people, wich is nothing. They found something, put a label on it and called it theirs. Any connection between the cultures and the buildings therefore is based on nothing.

Then, who built the buildings? About that we can speculate; could have been anythingf really. Aliens, pre-civilizations etc. I personally believe the pre-ice-age-culture thing (duval-hapgood-einstein) and also believe the alien people (von däniken) are making a fool of themselves and should stop uttering nonsensical crap (This include the one who started this post) that is based on the popular belief of many millions of idiots.