Planetarion Forums

Planetarion Forums (https://pirate.planetarion.com/index.php)
-   Alliance Discussions (https://pirate.planetarion.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   R72 discussion thread (https://pirate.planetarion.com/showthread.php?t=201330)

bitesize 24 May 2017 08:49

Re: R72 - Flame/Whine/Brag thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adapt (Post 3256605)
Black-Flag is not playing to win, KittenZ have confirmed they will play ftw but they dont think they can beat ultores.

Just alliance them up then!
Simple.

KHPMSBCX

reconverse 24 May 2017 09:36

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Goodluck, have fun, fly save

StarlockUV 25 May 2017 06:54

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Good luck all

Jumper 25 May 2017 11:13

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
^^ so good

Barrack_Obama 25 May 2017 16:20

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Let the games begin!!!!

Mzyxptlk 25 May 2017 16:30

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Go back to Hawaii, Obama!

Exor 25 May 2017 18:15

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Ftw

Henkka 25 May 2017 18:50

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
crashes here we come

Mano_ 25 May 2017 20:22

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Henkka (Post 3257147)
crashes here we come

happy hanakuakakuak to u all

Mano_ 25 May 2017 20:22

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
gl hf

Mano_ 25 May 2017 20:26

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
thank u

[DDK]gm 25 May 2017 21:03

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
too much spam

Virall 25 May 2017 21:27

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Gl everyone

Forest 25 May 2017 22:07

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
ready to go, gl all!

ArchsteR 25 May 2017 22:10

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Let's have some fun.

gmufc 25 May 2017 22:19

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
agreed

Third 26 May 2017 09:07

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Nice to see old allys makeing combacks :)
Good luck to all!

neps 26 May 2017 14:07

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
gg

neps 26 May 2017 16:06

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Gluck all

Xerxes 28 May 2017 22:53

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ave (Post 3256655)
venox and impressive dcing!

Im sure he is awesome, but you really think CTs dcing was impressive? They sure as hell lost roids at an impressive rate as soon as someone attacked them, hardly Venox' fault ofc. Or maybe you praised his efforts for trying to dc a lost cause?

BloodyButcher 30 May 2017 07:25

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
I dont think CT got DCs :p

[DDK]gm 30 May 2017 11:57

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xerxes (Post 3257769)
They sure as hell lost roids at an impressive rate as soon as someone attacked them

Kittenz we could cope with, it was the other 3 alliances that we couldn't. we were not built to fight fang that round so were defenseless.

VenoX 30 May 2017 13:35

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xerxes (Post 3257769)
Im sure he is awesome, but you really think CTs dcing was impressive? They sure as hell lost roids at an impressive rate as soon as someone attacked them, hardly Venox' fault ofc. Or maybe you praised his efforts for trying to dc a lost cause?

He obviously had low expectations of CT's defence the first night they p-targetted us on their own hence returning with friends subsequent nights. I was just one guy who bothered to DC CT that first night because I happened to have incs too. I don't think responsibility for CT's defensive performance in general should be placed solely at my door, I just did what I could when I was around.

We lost a lot of roids because we didn't ground when multiple allies were hitting us, nothing complicated there. It was the last week and our only play was to continue hitting Ult, we pretty much had only ally fleets to work with and a lot of people had already given up the round.

Ave 30 May 2017 16:13

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xerxes (Post 3257769)
Im sure he is awesome, but you really think CTs dcing was impressive? They sure as hell lost roids at an impressive rate as soon as someone attacked them, hardly Venox' fault ofc. Or maybe you praised his efforts for trying to dc a lost cause?

They did improve later part of the round. I believe it was mainly influence by VenoX, but thats just what rumours say.

Earlier they were less prepared or more offensive minded and we landed plenty.

[DDK]gm 30 May 2017 19:33

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Just a wee note to demort.... I have now lost all respect for you, I have been getting messages today from various people about you and that you said "GM told BF x", I have not spoken to BF and you have no right to infer to others that I have.

DO NOT use me as a excuse for your own bullshit!

[DDK]gm 30 May 2017 19:37

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
oh and if 1-3 fleets is a lot then yes CT has hit Catz a lot!!! moron ffs!!!

[DDK]gm 30 May 2017 19:47

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
tbh that goes for BF too, do not tell others I said things I didn't!! nelito isn't running your politics this round ;p

Andi 30 May 2017 20:48

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
CT is great and have balls ;)

Ave 31 May 2017 04:20

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by [DDK]gm (Post 3257853)
oh and if 1-3 fleets is a lot then yes CT has hit Catz a lot!!! moron ffs!!!

how dare you!

Pablitem 31 May 2017 13:31

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
I'm clearly using this for the roids. Anyway good luck everyone I believe ignoring the stupid changes this will be a good round. I hope app wins

Gkar 31 May 2017 23:59

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
What a terrible thread. Clearly PATSA will pwn us all.

Munkee 1 Jun 2017 06:17

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by [DDK]gm (Post 3257852)
DO NOT use me as a excuse for your own bullshit!

I believe this sort of thing has been happening ever since PA began. I often get a PM saying "I've been told by X that you are blocking/working with/wanting to hit Y". People believe these statements will draw out information, whether they are true or not. It does make it hard to believe anything a few people do have to say though. I know my politics has changed over the years due to the totally false stuff I've heard round after round.

Veni 1 Jun 2017 09:39

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Seemed to go off topic quite quickly this thread...

Seems ult are favourites for the win as usual. No doubt they will nap half the universe and noone else will have the balls to hit them early enough to stop the round win. Or if they try the rest of the universe will smash them hard.

Don't get why any ally would say they aren't playing to win otherwise why even bother forming a tag?! Playing to do as well as you can and knowing it's highly unlikely you won't win is still playing to win. Surely noone is actually going out of there way to make sure they don't win?!

BloodyButcher 1 Jun 2017 10:13

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Im pretty sure Ult said there wernt playing ftw, or atleast not as dedicated?

eksero 1 Jun 2017 10:23

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Veni

Don't get why any ally would say they aren't playing to win otherwise why even bother forming a tag?! Playing to do as well as you can and knowing it's highly unlikely you won't win is still playing to win. Surely noone is actually going out of there way to make sure they don't win?!

Isn't this what every alliance except ult does every round? :rolleyes:

CBA 1 Jun 2017 11:32

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
It is tick 150 or whatever and Alliances have Ingame NAPs/Allies

Others have deals already

Let us just have a fkin scrap !!!!

We don't all need to NAP/ALLY up. If someone gets too big. Let's all smash them.

If it's competitive all round - fun for all! :salute:

Veni 1 Jun 2017 13:06

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CBA (Post 3257925)

If it's competitive all round - fun for all! :salute:

Exactly! Sod naptarion and politics ruining the game!

Mzyxptlk 1 Jun 2017 13:14

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CBA (Post 3257925)
It is tick 150 or whatever and Alliances have Ingame NAPs/Allies

Others have deals already

Wow! That's so unexpected!

Kaiba 1 Jun 2017 14:34

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CBA (Post 3257925)
It is tick 150 or whatever and Alliances have Ingame NAPs/Allies

Others have deals already

Let us just have a fkin scrap !!!!

We don't all need to NAP/ALLY up. If someone gets too big. Let's all smash them.

If it's competitive all round - fun for all! :salute:


I think they try the smashing bit most rounds, and Ult STILL wins! :salute:

DrunkenViking 1 Jun 2017 15:18

Re: R72 discussion thread
 
lol, we've lost more rounds than we've won the past few years. I wonder where this fixation comes from..?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:07.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018