War with Fang
This is an official announcement that as of tonight CT has declared war on Fang. CT has always worked to take on the best and test ourselves rather than sit the fence. Some both inside and outside of CT have condemned CTs perceived fencing this round, with some validity. No longer can this be said however, we are now officially at war with the #1 ranked alliance in the game, who by the way has roughly a 20m value lead over CT, even though the scores are much closer. Who will win? It is yet to be seen, but let it not be said that CT doesn't try and make the round interesting!
Flame on! |
Re: War with Fang
:)
sweeeet! |
Re: War with Fang
Free roids :d
|
Re: War with Fang
LOL
man this just got too funny :D |
Re: War with Fang
This should be interesting, dunno what this rounds like of course but last round FAnG was fantastic at defence so i wish you luck :p
|
Re: War with Fang
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
This will be a short war with CT/Ultores block early on roiding down FAnG.
Ultores will be winning this round with ease. |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
nobodies stupid enough to actually believe that............. i think this guy is playing us eksero :D |
Re: War with Fang
soon winning eksero??
|
Re: War with Fang
i always win!
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
With a constant roid gain and 200+ incoming fleets every night, that actually makes Fang the best alliance ever. Either that or butcher is lying again. I can't even begin to speculate on which of these is more likely.
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Even if they catch you on roids they still have to then go past you and keep them in order for them to start catching up.... |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Fang Value: 109921319 CT Value: 91749216 Fang Value: 142092894 CT Value: 123530048 That's from friday and today. Looks pretty much the same to me |
Re: War with Fang
unbelievable how much shit this BloodyButcher talks lol, get proved wrong constantly
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
he is mathetically void Colt.. its not worth the effort...
YOu have to simplify it for him... B-Butcher if you have 20 apples a day and 1 apple makes 1 litre of Apple juice then every day you have 20 litres of apple juice If your rival has 15 apples then he only makes 15 litres a day For all the days you have more apples than him you are stockpiling more apple juice. 5 days of juice making and you have 100 litres (5x20) and he has 75 litres (15x5). Now if he find 5 more apples he will make the same amount of juice as you but you will still have that extra juice from before so he can never have more than you. If he find another apple or two then he will be producing more juice but you have that stockpile which would take him a while to catch up to before he overtakes... SEE SIMPLES!! |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Not that im saying that CT got more FC/Refs than FAnG/Ult or the other way around |
Re: War with Fang
Sigh B-butcher is there any point to even talk to you?
Crashing on Ct is widly considered to be a smart call because they wont be able to roid up fast enough the attackers will gain more in the long run because CT is so much worse than fang/ult. |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
It would be sensible to presume CT went mainly social/tot with Ult a mix of all 3. |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Anyway, CT is ahead of FAnG now, like i said they would be soon. |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Look who posted it.... |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Oh, wait, is this not kindergarten? |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
interesting fact did you know bbitch3r counted 350 hostile fleets today 1 by 1 ALL BY HIMSELF ??? :SALUTE: |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
|
Re: War with Fang
at least maximillian doesn't take himself seriously
|
Re: War with Fang
Im honoured to be compared with MaxMillian, atleast he is not as thick as a brick.
This surely will be a short war, we all knew that FAnG wouldnt outvalue/outgrow/or whatever people claimed they would while being targetted by CT+Ultores block. I wonder who gets underfire next... |
Re: War with Fang
You would've better defended yourselves if you had grounded. ¬_¬
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
FAnG still out value every other ally out there.....:rolleyes: I sometimes wonder what kick you get out of being proven wrong every time you post... |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
you might aswell make that thick as a brick your new forum sig itd suit you :rolleyes: incidently since it seems to be the only quote you know heres another one so you can expand your vocabulary a bit more "dumb as a door knob" |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Bloody-Butcher out of curiousity - how many alliances actually ptargetted you last night??? Remember i said ptarget and not people gal raiding... |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
afaik Ultores/CT/Apprime for sure. |
Re: War with Fang
xVx.
|
Re: War with Fang
would it be safe to presume it was 4 alliances??? with a some stragglers like always
Basically what Ultores got for 400 odd ticks yeah? How is the boot on the other foot? |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Ultores will win. |
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
FAnG heavily targeted Ultores, but didn't exclusively do it. We hit App, we hit DETWQ#TAF/xVx/etc This block will exclusively target FAnG until they get bored and twat CT out of existence, because there's no one left. It was basically a slightly lobsided war with the (laughably) 'best' alliance on the wrong side, probably the fairest round we've seen in a long time, but because it's not Ultores in first people decided that it wasn't correct and felt the need to make a disaster of the second half the round. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018